Channel coordination in a closed‐loop supply chain with fairness concerns under further extended producer responsibility

Ma, Yingqun; Cheng, Susu

doi:10.1002/mde.3719

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the absolute fairness concern function, fairness concern is expressed as aversion to "othering injustice" and tolerance and acceptance of "self-sustaining injustice". It is generally expressed in the following current form (Liu et al, 2018;Ma & Cheng, 2023;Zhou et al, 2023):…”

Section: Fairness Concernmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the absolute fairness concern function, fairness concern is expressed as aversion to “othering injustice” and tolerance and acceptance of “self‐sustaining injustice”. It is generally expressed in the following current form (Liu et al, 2018; Ma & Cheng, 2023; Zhou et al, 2023):

U_{i} goodbreak= π_{i} goodbreak- λ ((), π_{j} goodbreak- π_{i}),

where

π_{i}

and

π_{j}

denote decision maker

i

’s own profit and the profit at the reference point, respectively, and

λ

is the fairness concern factor (

λ > 0

). The higher the fairness concern factor, the greater the decision‐maker's concern with the fairness utility.…”

Section: Model Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Logistics service strategy for e‐commerce supply chain: Interactive impacts of cost reduction effort and fairness concern

Chen,

Dong,

Pang

et al. 2023

Manage Decis Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, the logistics industry has undergone tremendous development because of the growth of e‐commerce, providing supply chain members with various options for logistics service strategies. Furthermore, cost reduction effort (CRE) and fairness concern have become even more significant on the logistics operation for e‐commerce supply chain because of changing market conditions and consumer demands. Considering CRE and fairness concern, we propose a Stackelberg game model where the manufacturer acts as a leader to analyze how a manufacturer or a retailer strategically decides between two logistics service strategies, i.e., the manufacturer‐provided logistics service and the retailer‐provided logistics service. When the retailer provides logistics service in the absence of fairness concern, a “win‐win” outcome can be achieved. However, profit does not always increase in proportion to the logistics service cost factor when fairness concern is considered. Additionally, there is a situation where the optimal logistics service strategy for the manufacturer and the retailer is contrary to each other in different ranges of fairness concern intensity when the logistics service provider both has CRE and fairness concern. As a consequence, it becomes important for both the manufacturer and the retailer to balance their fairness concern and consider the effectiveness of CRE when making decisions about adopting logistics service strategy.

show abstract

Section: Fairness Concernmentioning

confidence: 99%

U_{i} goodbreak= π_{i} goodbreak- λ ((), π_{j} goodbreak- π_{i}),

where

π_{i}

and

π_{j}

denote decision maker

i

’s own profit and the profit at the reference point, respectively, and

λ

is the fairness concern factor (

λ > 0

). The higher the fairness concern factor, the greater the decision‐maker's concern with the fairness utility.…”

Section: Model Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Logistics service strategy for e‐commerce supply chain: Interactive impacts of cost reduction effort and fairness concern

Chen,

Dong,

Pang

et al. 2023

Manage Decis Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The global-scale nature of the supply chain results in a range of implications for international trade and economic integration. On the one hand, automobiles have reshaped citizens' lives, allowing people to have unique mobility patterns and lifestyles (Ma & Cheng, 2023). The interaction process between the automotive industry and external stakeholders has created a fertile ground for sustainability development (van Loon et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalisation On Automotive Supply Chain for Climate Competitiveness: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis

Manikrishna,

Sai,

Jaggaiah

et al. 2024

Intl. J. Rel.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The automotive industry, a cornerstone of global manufacturing, is undergoing a profound transformation driven by digitalization. This research paper explores the impact of digitalization on the automotive supply chain and its role in enhancing climate competitiveness. As the industry strives to meet stringent environmental standards and consumer demands for sustainability, leveraging digital technologies becomes imperative. We use R Studio software to perform bibliometric analysis in this study. Our initial repository for data came from the Scopus database. Following a keyword search and before applying the limited criteria, we were able to find 3202 papers. We then started integrating the limited criteria, which included the following: stream: Business Management & Accounting, source type: Journal, no author, duplicate titles, and language: English. After applying these criteria, we were able to find 935 papers. We selected citations, bibliographical data, abstracts and keywords, funding information, and other data before exporting our database from Scopus.

show abstract

Incentive contract design for reducing carbon emissions in the supply chain under asymmetric information

Zhou,

2024

Manage Decis Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In light of the volatility of market demand and carbon trading prices, this study examines the effects of two carbon policies—the carbon tax policy and the cap‐and‐trade policy—as well as various information structures on the supply chain's carbon emission reduction incentives. A brand incentivizes the carbon abatement effort of an upstream supplier through a two‐part contract in the form of a fixed salary and a proportional incentive. We discover that, under some circumstances, the brand may benefit more from the unobservability of supply chain information. The brand bundles the risk of uncertainty with the supplier through the proportional incentive. In classical incentive contracts, only the cost is considered and the positive effect of risk conveyance is often ignored. In our study, the brand needs to investigate a trade‐off between the benefit of risk conveyance and the drawback of the incentive cost. On one hand, the proportional incentive characterizes the incentive cost. The brand increases the incentive intensity due to the unobservable effort of the supplier. On the other hand, it also has a risk conveyance effect. Specifically, the proportional incentive decreases with the correlation coefficient under the cap‐and‐trade policy. Additionally, there are situations in which consumer surplus benefits from the observability of supply chain information. However, supply chain information transparency is harmful to consumer surplus as supplier risk aversion increases.

show abstract

Channel coordination in a closed‐loop supply chain with fairness concerns under further extended producer responsibility

Cited by 7 publications

References 63 publications

Logistics service strategy for e‐commerce supply chain: Interactive impacts of cost reduction effort and fairness concern

Logistics service strategy for e‐commerce supply chain: Interactive impacts of cost reduction effort and fairness concern

Digitalisation On Automotive Supply Chain for Climate Competitiveness: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis

Incentive contract design for reducing carbon emissions in the supply chain under asymmetric information

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About