2013
DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0000038014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 10 The Configurational Approach in Organizational Network Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article, we adopt a set-theoretic approach to network of networks, in line with the long-standing recommendation by Alexander (2015) Figure 1. In such an approach, a network of networks is "best understood as clusters of interconnected structures and practices" of various networks being distinct entities and having unique identities (Fiss 2007(Fiss , 1180Provan and Kenis 2008;Raab, Lemaire, and Provan 2013). This means a clean break from the predominant linear paradigm and instead adopting a systemic view in which we assume that "patterns of attributes will exhibit different features and lead to different outcomes depending on how they are arranged" (Fiss 2007(Fiss , 1181Provan, Fish, and Sydow 2007;Provan and Kenis 2008).…”
Section: Network Of Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we adopt a set-theoretic approach to network of networks, in line with the long-standing recommendation by Alexander (2015) Figure 1. In such an approach, a network of networks is "best understood as clusters of interconnected structures and practices" of various networks being distinct entities and having unique identities (Fiss 2007(Fiss , 1180Provan and Kenis 2008;Raab, Lemaire, and Provan 2013). This means a clean break from the predominant linear paradigm and instead adopting a systemic view in which we assume that "patterns of attributes will exhibit different features and lead to different outcomes depending on how they are arranged" (Fiss 2007(Fiss , 1181Provan, Fish, and Sydow 2007;Provan and Kenis 2008).…”
Section: Network Of Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para a análise da rede a partir do indivíduo, normalmente é utilizada a Social Network Analysis (SNA), observando-se, por exemplo, densidade, centralidade e buracos estruturais (Wasserman & Faust, 1994). Por outro lado, para análise do fenômeno da organização em rede convém a abordagem desta como uma forma de governança (Jones, Hesterly, & Borgatti, 1997;Moretti, 2017;Provan et al, 2007;Raab, Lemaire, & Provan, 2013).…”
Section: As Redes Organizacionaisunclassified
“…Efetividade da rede em si mesma, para se manter no tempo e atingir seus objetivos propostos (Provan & Kenis, 2008;Raab et al, 2013) Variáveis de desempenho (ou resultado) de efetividade Capacidade para atingir os objetivos declarados A efetividade da rede no alcance de seus objetivos propostos, considerando um ou mais níveis de análise (Kenis & Provan, 2009;Turrini et al, 2010) Estabilidade e viabilidade da rede A efetividade pela sua capacidade de existir e se manter no tempo (Provan & Milward, 2001;Turrini et al, 2010) Inovação e mudança de rede A efetividade como capacidade de criar ou se adaptar a condições mais favoráveis para a existência da rede (Turrini et al, 2010) Fonte: Autoria própria.…”
Section: Clienteunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations