Chapter 38 International trade policy and negotiations

Sumner, Daniel A.; Tangermann, Stefan

doi:10.1016/s1574-0072(02)10025-9

Cited by 19 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Trade and development also dominated agricultural economics research, especially after the mid-1980's, as global trade negotiations increasingly hinged on struggles between heavily subsidized farm sectors in OECD countries and the highly taxed sectors of the developing world (Anderson and Hayami, 1986;Kreuger, Schiff and Valdès, 1991-92;Sumner and Tangermann, 2002). An overview of postwar agricultural trade policy was given by D. G. Johnson (1977); a synthetic treatment of agriculturetrade interactions was provided by Karp and Perloff (2002).…”

Section: A French Professional Association Began and A Department Ofmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rural municipalities in the context of the provisions of rural economics

Dvoryadkina¹,

Белоусова²

2017

RETP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: A French Professional Association Began and A Department Ofmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rural municipalities in the context of the provisions of rural economics

Dvoryadkina¹,

Белоусова²

2017

RETP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Es verwundert daher nur wenig, dass die mit steigender Rechnerkapazität zunehmende Komplexität der verwendeten "Apparate" im Bereich der simulationsmodell-basierten ökonomischen Literatur seit jeher den Vorwurf chronischer Intransparenz provoziert hat und inzwischen für zeitgenössische Simulationsexperimente unter der Doha-Runde selbst deskriptive Vergleiche einander ähnlicher Studien nur sehr eingeschränkt durchführbar sind (Sumner und Tangermann 2002).…”

Section: Einleitung Und Fragestellungunclassified

“…Zweifellos determiniert die Qualität solcher exogener Parameter die Qualität der späteren Simulationsergebnisse, wenn auch in einem a priori unbekannten Maß. Dies impliziert, dass die methodischen Herausforderungen bei der ökonometrischen Quantifizierung kausaler Zusammenhänge innerhalb der Sozial-und Wirtschaftswissenschaften auch einen begrenzenden Faktor für die empirische Validierung angewandter Gleichgewichtsmodelle darstellen (Sumner und Tangermann 2002, S. 2039.…”

Section: Unzureichende Empirische Absicherung Der Modelleunclassified

Meta-Analyse angewandter Gleichgewichtsmodelle des internationalen Agrarhandels

Heß¹

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

großartige Zusammenarbeit! Darüber hinaus gab es Menschen, die durch meist kurze, mitunter kritische, für mich aber gerade deshalb häufig wegweisende Kommentare ihr Interesse an diesem Projekt bekundeten und in wichtiger Weise-mutatis mutandis-zum Entstehen dieser Arbeit beigetragen haben. Ich möchte daher insbesondere Holger Bergmann, Martin Banse, Frank von Tongeren, Jesper Kuehl sowie meiner Schwester Cordelia und meinem Onkel Heinrich danken! Aber es gab auch diejenigen, die in diese Arbeit nicht direkt eingebunden waren, die meine Abwesenheit und Anspannung über Jahre hingenommen und mir dennoch Ihre Geduld, Ihr Verständnis, ihren Rat und ihre Bedenken entgegengebracht haben. Insbesondere Constanze sowie meiner Mutter, meinen Freunden Basil, Bernhard, Henryk, Maike und Paul verdanke ich, dass mich Ausdauer und Zuversicht nie verlassen haben. Danke! Inhaltsverzeichnis Verzeichnis der Tabellen .

show abstract

“…(I will not review the URAA in any detail here. For a brief review of the URAA in the context of farm trade negotiations see Sumner and Tangermann 2002) Remember, USA farm bills do not typically deal directly with import tariffs or tariff rate quotas (TRQ). The USA schedule of import barrier reductions and related rules was set in the implementing legislation in 1994.…”

Section: Context: Prices Policy and Wto Disciplinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implications of the US Farm Bill of 2002 for agricultural trade and trade negotiations

Sumner

2003

Aus J Agri & Res Econ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The US Farm Bill of 2002 is the latest in a 7‐decade history of farm subsidy laws that transfer funds to farmers and regulate and subsidize production of selected commodities. Fruit, tree nut, ornamental and vegetable crops, hay and meats remain outside scope of main subsidy programs. The new law continues many innovations of the 1996 Act, such as removal of authority for annual land idling and crop price floors accompanied by government stockholding. Government payments remain the primary focus of commodity programs. The total amount of these payments are likely to remain similar to the amount paid in the period 1999–2001, but with some changes in the form of the programs. For example, allowing owners to update acreage and yield payment bases creates additional incentives for farmers to link current planting decisions to anticipated farm subsidies. Similarly, the new program that ties “counter‐cyclical” payments to the price of a specific crop also has production stimulus. A new program, estimated to add about 5–10 per cent to marginal milk revenue for smaller farms, makes ‘deficiency’ payments to dairy farms when milk prices are low. Despite the new programs with added links to stimulating production, new USA programs stimulate production only marginally more than the subsidies of the 1999–2001 period, which were replaced. Furthermore, the USA has flexibility to avoid explicitly violating its WTO commitments. Nonetheless, this US Farm Bill of 2002 has curtailed the previous trends toward lower farm subsidies and smaller production stimuli, and the negative publicity surrounding it has made negotiating reductions of farm trade distortions more difficult.

show abstract

Chapter 38 International trade policy and negotiations

Cited by 19 publications

References 68 publications

Rural municipalities in the context of the provisions of rural economics

Rural municipalities in the context of the provisions of rural economics

Meta-Analyse angewandter Gleichgewichtsmodelle des internationalen Agrarhandels

Implications of the US Farm Bill of 2002 for agricultural trade and trade negotiations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About