JBI Reviewer's Manual 2019
DOI: 10.46658/jbirm-17-05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 5: Systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
229
0
10

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
229
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality of the studies was assessed according to the set of criteria based on Joanna Briggs Institute guidance on conducting prevalence and incidence reviews [ 15 , 16 ] and are summarized in Table 3 . A set of eight criteria was used to assess the quality of the studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quality of the studies was assessed according to the set of criteria based on Joanna Briggs Institute guidance on conducting prevalence and incidence reviews [ 15 , 16 ] and are summarized in Table 3 . A set of eight criteria was used to assess the quality of the studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two reviewers independently extracted data using a standardized form. Study quality was assessed by each reviewer, according to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance on conducting prevalence and incidence reviews [ 15 , 16 ] and following data’s were extracted from each study for quality assessment purpose: was the sample representative of the target population, were study participants recruited in an appropriate way, was the sample size adequate, were the study subjects & setting described in detail, was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample, were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition, was the condition measured reliably, and are all the important confounding factors/subgroups/differences identified and accounted for.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal checklist will be used to assess the overall quality of studies reporting prevalence (online supplementary file 2) . 23 24 …”
Section: Methods and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 – 58 None of the studies included in this review were primarily designed as prevalence studies, and all the studies included had a variable risk of bias when appraised using the prevalence appraisal checklist ( Table S2 ). 43 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ten-item methodological appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data was used. 43 Interpretations specific to the review questions ( Table S2 ) were used by two independent reviewers; when consensus was not reached, then a third reviewer was consulted. No studies were excluded on the basis of the methodological bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%