1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0126(199708)43:4<359::aid-pi772>3.0.co;2-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of the Scratch Deformation Mechanisms for Poly(methylmethacrylate) using Surface Optical Reflectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The laser profilometer (Rodenstock, Germany) was capable of measuring to a depth resolution of 1 nm (z-axis) and 0.2 lm in the lateral directions [10]. A JSM-5300, SEM from Gresham Scientific Instruments, UK was used to retrieve images of the scratched surfaces.…”
Section: Scratch Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The laser profilometer (Rodenstock, Germany) was capable of measuring to a depth resolution of 1 nm (z-axis) and 0.2 lm in the lateral directions [10]. A JSM-5300, SEM from Gresham Scientific Instruments, UK was used to retrieve images of the scratched surfaces.…”
Section: Scratch Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The errors are uncertain but the data are probably generally reproducible at random locations to within better than ±50%. load [10]. Although the extent and nature of the strain relaxation upon unloading cannot be established in detail, it is clear that significant elastic recovery does occur during unloading.…”
Section: Nano-indentation-contact Compliancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many attempts have been made to quantify scratch visibility by measuring the surface reflectivity of the scratch. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Due to the diverse techniques employed and the lack of systematic studies to correlate scratch features with visibility, 11 the results obtained from one set of experiments are often valid within a set of narrowly defined conditions. It remains to be seen which of these methods, if any, will prove to be the most useful in characterizing scratch visibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, effects of temperature, strain, and strain rate, which are related to the material properties, the probe geometry, the loading rate, and the scratch speed, should be thoroughly investigated. To date, only Briscoe et al, [8][9][10][11][12] and more recently Sue and co-workers 16,17 and Gauthier et al, 24,25 have studied the effects of different test variables on the scratch behavior of polyers. Also, very little modeling has been performed to understand how changes in testing conditions affect the local stress and strain fields.…”
Section: (A) (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Recent efforts have been aimed at measuring quantitative material properties and understanding the relationships between surface properties and performance characteristics. In most of these studies, single-probe testing devices, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] including instrumented indentation and scratch systems [4][5][6][17][18][19] and atomic force microscopes, 3,[20][21][22] have been used to simulate single asperity contact, as opposed to multi-asperity contact associated with the field simulation tests. Single-probe scratch testing can be useful for characterizing the time-and strain-dependent behavior of a polymeric material under a number of contact conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%