2014
DOI: 10.3390/axioms3020202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristic Number: Theory and Its Application to Shape Analysis

Abstract: Geometric invariants are important for shape recognition and matching. Existing invariants in projective geometry are typically defined on the limited number (e.g., five for the classical cross-ratio) of collinear planar points and also lack the ability to characterize the curve or surface underlying the given points. In this paper, we present a projective invariant named after the characteristic number of planar algebraic curves. The characteristic number in this work reveals an intrinsic property of an algeb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applications of algebraic curves encompass several domains in the mathematical sciences and in the computational sciences [12,13]. There are interplays between algebraic curves and the concepts of topology that determine various interesting algebraic as well as topological properties [12].…”
Section: Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications of algebraic curves encompass several domains in the mathematical sciences and in the computational sciences [12,13]. There are interplays between algebraic curves and the concepts of topology that determine various interesting algebraic as well as topological properties [12].…”
Section: Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the structure of the line neighborhood was sensitive to the inaccurate location of line endpoints. Jia et al [19] proposed a coplanar line-points projective invariant named the characteristic number [20] to undertake the matching. Two line segments were assumed to be coplanar, if the intersection of the two lines was close to one of the endpoints.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%