2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/720/1/012047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristic variogram for land use in Multispectral Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If both neighboring values are above or below the average, the outcome becomes positive reflecting the presence of a similar pattern. Otherwise, the negative outcome of the two mean Theoretically, the expected random value of the Moran I is −1/(n − 1), where n equals the number of observations (Mera, Condal, Rios, & Silva, 2016). This means that the zero cutoff cannot be used as a reference point to distinguish positive and negative spatial autocorrelation (particular in the presence of a small dataset).…”
Section: Spatial Autocorrelationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If both neighboring values are above or below the average, the outcome becomes positive reflecting the presence of a similar pattern. Otherwise, the negative outcome of the two mean Theoretically, the expected random value of the Moran I is −1/(n − 1), where n equals the number of observations (Mera, Condal, Rios, & Silva, 2016). This means that the zero cutoff cannot be used as a reference point to distinguish positive and negative spatial autocorrelation (particular in the presence of a small dataset).…”
Section: Spatial Autocorrelationmentioning
confidence: 99%