Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care service delivery models: a systematic scoping review

Abstract

BackgroundIndigenous populations have poorer health outcomes compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts. The evolution of Indigenous primary health care services arose from mainstream health services being unable to adequately meet the needs of Indigenous communities and Indigenous peoples often being excluded and marginalised from mainstream health services. Part of the solution has been to establish Indigenous specific primary health care services, for and managed by Indigenous peoples. There are a number of reasons why Indigenous primary health care services are more likely than mainstream services to improve the health of Indigenous communities. Their success is partly due to the fact that they often provide comprehensive programs that incorporate treatment and management, prevention and health promotion, as well as addressing the social determinants of health. However, there are gaps in the evidence base including the characteristics that contribute to the success of Indigenous primary health care services in providing comprehensive primary health care. This systematic scoping review aims to identify the characteristics of Indigenous primary health care service delivery models.MethodThis systematic scoping review was led by an Aboriginal researcher, using the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review Methodology. All published peer-reviewed and grey literature indexed in PubMed, EBSCO CINAHL, Embase, Informit, Mednar, and Trove databases from September 1978 to May 2015 were reviewed for inclusion. Studies were included if they describe the characteristics of service delivery models implemented within an Indigenous primary health care service. Sixty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and then thematically analysed to identify the characteristics of Indigenous PHC service delivery models.ResultsCulture was the most prominent characteristic underpinning all of the other seven characteristics which were identified – accessible health services, community participation, continuous quality improvement, culturally appropriate and skilled workforce, flexible approach to care, holistic health care, and self-determination and empowerment.ConclusionWhile the eight characteristics were clearly distinguishable within the review, the interdependence between each characteristic was also evident. These findings were used to develop a new Indigenous PHC Service Delivery Model, which clearly demonstrates some of the unique characteristics of Indigenous specific models.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12992-018-0332-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

We won't find what we don't look for: Identifying barriers and enablers of chronic wet cough in Aboriginal children

“…Beyond the barriers relating to clinician knowledge and practice, key barriers in health systems include staffing problems and the health service model. Three recent reviews on the primary care for Aboriginal people with chronic disease echoed similar barriers to the optimal management of chronic disease, including high staff turnover, lack of dedicated chronic disease management staff to coordinate care, lack of specific chronic disease training for staff, lack of cultural security and demanding workloads …”

“…Three recent reviews on the primary care for Aboriginal people with chronic disease echoed similar barriers to the optimal management of chronic disease, including high staff turnover, lack of dedicated chronic disease management staff to coordinate care, lack of specific chronic disease training for staff, lack of cultural security and demanding workloads. [30][31][32] Service provision via a model of care that enables management of chronic lung disease and addresses the complex needs of Aboriginal families must include: (i) resources and staff dedicated to specific chronic lung disease detection and management according to protocols, including post-hospitalization follow-up for lower respiratory tract infections; (ii) trained and empowered AHW throughout the healthcare system; and (iii) health education to teach families about chronic lung disease. 30 A study limitation is the focus on one region; however, almost all doctors related their experiences to working in other rural and remote regions of Australia and overseas, suggesting that the study findings are generalizable to other regions.…”

Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations address health equity through action on the social determinants of health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia.

“…There is widespread agreement that for Aboriginal culture is at the heart of ACCHO practice and was present throughout most activities described in annual reports which is not surprising given the importance culture to the health and wellbeing of the community (p. 9) [24]. This evidence is supported by findings of a 2018 systematic review where culture was identified as underpinning all ACCHO practice [27], and the National Aboriginal and Torres health. Furthermore, we argue that culture and societal values, rather than being an independent socio-political factor, are the basis on which socio-political discourse and policies are built.…”

Emerging evidence of the value of health assessments for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the primary healthcare setting

“…Improving the delivery of evidence-based preventive care requires broader investments in health service capacity and strong Indigenous participation in PHC centres, both of which are characterised by community-controlled services; an appropriate number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander staff at all levels of the PHC service; the meaningful use of data to support quality of care and CQI; and investments in regional support structures and functions (Bailie et al 2017;Harfield et al 2018). Previous research has identified specific barriers to implementation of health assessments (Kehoe and Lovett 2008;Bailie et al 2013;Jennings et al 2014;Schütze et al 2016), and this provides useful guidance for developing targeted interventions to improve uptake of health assessments.…”