2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and distribution of NKD, a receptor for Drosophila tachykinin-related peptide 6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
77
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that ITPL acted only on BNGR-A24 and not on BNGR-A32 or -A33, indicating that these three BNGRs may have different modes of recognition for ITPL. The situation is similar to that reported for DTKR and NKD recognition and activation by TRPs in D. melanogaster; DTKR recognizes all six TKPs (35), whereas only one isoform of the six TRPs can activate NKD (36). In this context, BNGR-A24, -A32, and -A33 may also show selectivity for B. mori TRPs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Bngr-a2 and -A34 As Itp Receptors-supporting
confidence: 84%
“…We observed that ITPL acted only on BNGR-A24 and not on BNGR-A32 or -A33, indicating that these three BNGRs may have different modes of recognition for ITPL. The situation is similar to that reported for DTKR and NKD recognition and activation by TRPs in D. melanogaster; DTKR recognizes all six TKPs (35), whereas only one isoform of the six TRPs can activate NKD (36). In this context, BNGR-A24, -A32, and -A33 may also show selectivity for B. mori TRPs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Bngr-a2 and -A34 As Itp Receptors-supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Indeed, of the five crustacean pyrokinins we tested [FSPRLamide, CabPK1, CabPK2, PevPK1 and PevPK2 (Ma et al, 2008;Saideman et al, 2007;Torfs et al, 2000)], only one had any effects, suggesting that the receptor in the lobster heart is much more constrained than the receptor that mediates the effects of pyrokinins in the crab stomatogastric system. Such differences in receptor specificity have been seen, for example, in Drosophila, in which one receptor for tachykinin-related peptides is highly specific, responding only to a single isoform, whereas a second receptor is less specific (Poels et al, 2009). Whether this is a difference in the two species or in the receptors in the two parts of the nervous system is not clear from this study alone [but see our companion article (Dickinson et al, 2015)].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…These differences in the signaling properties of these two related receptors are not without precedent. For example, in Drosophila, the tachykinin receptors encoded by CG7887 and CG6515, show fundamental differences in peptide sensitivity, β-arrestin associations, and tissue distributions (Birse et al, 2006;Poels et al, C. E. Hector and others 2009). In mammals, the two different CRF receptors, which are highly related to the diuretic hormone receptors discussed here, also show similar differences in receptor properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%