Characterization and Interpretation of Cd (II) Adsorption by Different Modified Rice Straws under Contrasting Conditions

Abstract

Rice straw can adsorb Cd(II) from wastewater, and modification of rice straw may improve its adsorption efficiency. The rice straw powder (Sp) from the direct pulverization of rice straw was used as the control, the rice straw ash (Sa), biochar (Sa), and modified rice straw (Ms) were prepared by ashing, pyrolysis and citric acid modification, respectively, and all of them were examined as adsorbents for Cd(II) in this study. Batch adsorption experiments were adopted to systematically compare the adsorption capacities of rice straw materials prepared with different modification methods for Cd(II) from aqueous solution under different levels of initial Cd(II) concentration (0–800 mg·L−1), temperature (298, 308, and 318 K), contact time (0–1440 min), pH value (2–10), and ionic strength (0–0.6 mol·L−1). The results indicated that the modification method affected the adsorption of Cd(II) by changing the specific surface area (SSA), Si content, surface morphology, and O-containing functional group of rice straw. Compared with Sp, Ms held more surface O–H, aliphatic and aromatic groups, while Sa had more phenolic, C–O (or C–O–C), and Si–O groups, and Sb held more C–O (or C–O–C) and Si–O groups; besides, Sa, Sb, and Ms had larger SSA than Sp. Adsorption capacity of the four adsorbents for Cd(II) increased and gradually became saturated with the increase in the initial Cd(II) concentration (0–800 mg·L−1). The adsorption capacity of Cd(II) was significantly higher at 318 K than 298 K and 308 K, regardless of the adsorbent type. Sa had the largest SSA (192.38 m2·g−1) and the largest adsorption capacity for Cd(II). When the initial Cd2+ concentration was at 800 mg·L−1, the Cd(II) adsorption amount reached as high as 68.7 mg·g−1 with Sa at 318 K. However, the SSA of Sp was only 1.83 m2·g−1, and it had the least adsorption capacity for Cd(II). Only the adsorption of Cd(II) upon Sb at 298 K was spontaneous, and surprisingly, all other adsorptions were nonspontaneous. These adsorptions were all chemical, and were favorable, exothermic and order-increasing processes. The pseudo-second-order model showed a strong fit to the kinetics of Cd(II) adsorption by the four adsorbents. The adsorption capacities of Cd(II) by the adsorbents were less at low pH, and all were enhanced with the increase of initial pH value (2–10) in the solution. The inhibiting effect on Cd(II) adsorption due to the increase in ionic strength was greater with Sa, Sb, and Ms than that under Sp. The rice straw ash prepared by ashing unexpectedly had greater adsorption capacity for Cd(II) than the biochar and citric acid modified rice straw. The optimum condition for Cd(II) adsorption was established as the temperature of 318 K, initial Cd(II) concentration of 800 mg·L−1, contact time of 240 min, and no Na(I) interference regardless of absorbent. In conclusion, rice straw ash shows the greatest potential of being applied to paddy fields for the remediation of Cd(II) pollution so as to reduce the risk of Cd(II) enrichment in rice grains and straws.

Mechanism and isotherm modeling of effective adsorption of malachite green as endocrine disruptive dye using Acid Functionalized Maize Cob (AFMC)

“…Estimation of the quantity adsorbed and percentage removal efficiency was done using Eqs. ( 4) and ( 5) [47][48][49] Presented in Tables 1 and 2 are the descriptions of both isotherm, kinetics, and mechanism models used in this study.…”

“…q e,exp − q e,cal q e,exp 2 Table 1. Adsorption Isotherm Models (Non-linear and linear models with the description of parameters) [46][47][48][49][50] .…”

“…K J is Jovanovic isotherm constant (L/g) determined from the slope of plot of ln q e against C e Table 2. Kinetics and mechanism modeling of adsorption [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] .…”

Mechanism and Isotherm Modeling of Effective Adsorption of Malachite Green as Endocrine Disruptive Dye using Acid Functionalized Maize Cob (AFMC)

“…Estimation of the quantity adsorbed and percentage removal efficiency was done using Eq. 4 and 5 [37][38][39] : (4)…”

Polystyrene Magnetic Nanocomposites as Antibiotic Adsorbents

“…Nowadays, nanotechnologies are mainly used in water and wastewater treatment, using materials like iron nanoparticles, zeolites and magnetic nanomaterials [30,31]. Among the various methods, adsorption is a simple, environmental friendly, fast, highly efficient and low-cost solution, making it one of the most favorable methods [32][33][34][35][36][37].…”