2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of 3D printed long fibre reinforced composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
185
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 373 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
185
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that hybrid high modulus (HM) carbon fibre composite have compressive strength with 30% more axial modulus than intermediate modulus (IM) carbon fibre composites for 3D printed functional parts [20]. Some researchers outlined that reinforced nylon parts have higher mechanical properties than the nonreinforced nylon parts [21]. The compressive strength of the 3D printed poly amide (PA)12 composite lattice structures with fibre-reinforcements is lower than that without fibre-reinforcements, but the repetitive energy absorption property of the 3D printed PA12 composites lattice structures with fibre-reinforcements are more stable than that without fiber-reinforcements [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that hybrid high modulus (HM) carbon fibre composite have compressive strength with 30% more axial modulus than intermediate modulus (IM) carbon fibre composites for 3D printed functional parts [20]. Some researchers outlined that reinforced nylon parts have higher mechanical properties than the nonreinforced nylon parts [21]. The compressive strength of the 3D printed poly amide (PA)12 composite lattice structures with fibre-reinforcements is lower than that without fibre-reinforcements, but the repetitive energy absorption property of the 3D printed PA12 composites lattice structures with fibre-reinforcements are more stable than that without fiber-reinforcements [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, elements produced by Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) additive manufacturing are mainly used for applications with no or only few structural requirements in building construction (especially when thinking about constructive applications as part of the main supporting structure) and the testing procedures for the mechanical behavior focus on the testing of plastics [9][10][11][12][13]. The evaluation of the mechanical behavior (mainly just using small scale tensile tests) has been carried out in the course of several experimental investigations [14][15][16][17][18]. In [19], for example, especially the influence of different print layer orientations was investigated, resulting in a degradation in strength compared with bulk material properties (30-53%, depending on orientation) and as manufactured properties and as manufactured properties as reported by the FDM vendor (36-63%, depending on orientation).…”
Section: Test Specimens and Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 34 In addition to above-mentioned materials, carbon-fiber and glass-fiber reinforced composite filament materials are used in 3D printing devices. Justo et al [42] experimentally tested specimens printed from the reinforced endless carbon-fiber reinforced filaments with a high ratio of carbon and measured the ultimate stress values of 700 MPa. In another reported study, the processability of glass fiber-reinforced ABS composites with three different glass fiber proportions was examined.…”
Section: Printing Filament Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%