1995
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(96)80676-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of A re-designed clinical fluoroscopic portal imager

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For 1 MU per projection, it may be important to use a reference dosimeter like that in the water scans system to eliminate the dose rate fluctuation (c) map the fan beam projections into parallel ones since the current MLS-ART produces the best reconstruction accuracy for parallel beams (or alternatively, develop a fan beam MLS-ART algorithm by reordering the rays in each projection) (d) investigate the feasibility of using cone beams for 3D portal CT reconstruction using MLS-ART and the same EPID system as an alternative approach to the study of Jaffray et al (1996). This work represents an alternative feasibility study of MV CT to those using cone beams (Jaffray et al 1996, Midgley et al 1998. Since the real advantage of MV CT is in differentiating soft tissues by 1%, clinical use of the current portal CT is not reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 1 MU per projection, it may be important to use a reference dosimeter like that in the water scans system to eliminate the dose rate fluctuation (c) map the fan beam projections into parallel ones since the current MLS-ART produces the best reconstruction accuracy for parallel beams (or alternatively, develop a fan beam MLS-ART algorithm by reordering the rays in each projection) (d) investigate the feasibility of using cone beams for 3D portal CT reconstruction using MLS-ART and the same EPID system as an alternative approach to the study of Jaffray et al (1996). This work represents an alternative feasibility study of MV CT to those using cone beams (Jaffray et al 1996, Midgley et al 1998. Since the real advantage of MV CT is in differentiating soft tissues by 1%, clinical use of the current portal CT is not reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers have demonstrated larger improvements to the efficiency of the optical chain of their prototype systems. 22,23 Such increases in the amount of light reaching the TV camera would alleviate the secondary quantum sink affecting video-based portal imagers 6 as well as increase the theoretical DQE of the video-based system by a factor as high as 9.6, depending on spatial frequency. Therefore, this experiment determines what increase in DQE is required to make noticeable visual impact.…”
Section: A Virtual Prototypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of megavoltage (MV) computerized tomography (CT) systems have been engineered, based upon radiotherapy linear accelerator (LINAC) treatment beams operating in a fan beam scanning mode (see, for example, Simpson et al 1982, Swindell et al 1983, Brahme et al 1987, Lewis et al 1992. The recent availability of electronic portal imaging device (EPID) area detectors presents the possibility of expanding this work to cone beam scanning (Jaffray et al 1996). The reconstruction method for a circular orbit, cone beam scan (Feldkamp et al 1984, Webb et al 1987, Morton et al 1990 is similar to conventional filtered back-projection algorithms for single-slice fan beam CT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%