2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.117697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a small-scale crystallizer using CFD simulations and X-ray CT measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean induction times for various energy dissipation rates for paracetamol nucleation ( S = 2.27) from aqueous solution for different crystallizers and solution volumes. The energy dissipation rates for the vials with overhead and magnetic stirrers were extracted from the literature . A first-degree polynomial was fitted to the data, and the corresponding fits are shown in the legend.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean induction times for various energy dissipation rates for paracetamol nucleation ( S = 2.27) from aqueous solution for different crystallizers and solution volumes. The energy dissipation rates for the vials with overhead and magnetic stirrers were extracted from the literature . A first-degree polynomial was fitted to the data, and the corresponding fits are shown in the legend.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher fidelity crystallizer models that take into account imperfect mixing and other transport effects via the use of computational fluid dynamics are available. [372][373][374][375] However, they are subject to the same limitations mentioned above with respect to secondary nucleation and impurity effects.…”
Section: Open Problems In Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32 Second, process conditions may vary within the volume; thermal gradients and hydrodynamic variabilities may be present and may alter the local nucleation rate. 15,33 Primary nucleation is commonly interpreted in the context of the classical nucleation theory (CNT). 1,28 The functional form used in this work is the one used in the experimental reference work by Cedeno et al, 3 namely…”
Section: Three Aspects Of Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We highlight that such averaging is inaccurate under two conditions. First, in the case of heterogeneous nucleation, nucleation events are enabled by nucleation sites on external surfaces. , These sites, however, may be distributed arbitrarily within the system. , Since external surfaces such as crystallizer walls may also act as nucleation sites, the primary nucleation frequency may not scale linearly with volume in real processes. , Second, process conditions may vary within the volume; thermal gradients and hydrodynamic variabilities may be present and may alter the local nucleation rate. , …”
Section: Three Aspects Of Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%