2012
DOI: 10.5194/amt-5-1667-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of atmospheric aerosol in the US Southeast from ground- and space-based measurements over the past decade

Abstract: Abstract. This study examines how aerosols measured from the ground and space over the US Southeast change temporally over a regional scale during the past decade. PM 2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter > 2.5 micrometers) data consist of two datasets that represent the measurements that are used for regulatory purposes by the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) and continuous measurements used for quickly disseminating air quality information. AOD (aerosol optical depth) data come from three… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
23
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 shows that the measured surface concentrations exhibit only a fraction of the seasonality in the column AOD observed by the satellite instruments, suggesting that changes in surface concentrations do not dictate the seasonality observed in AOD. This is in agreement with Alston et al (2012), who show that the summertime enhancement in surface PM 2.5 in Georgia is considerably less than the AOD enhancement over the region. This presents an intriguing disconnect between surface and column measurements of aerosol loading in the SEUS.…”
Section: Seasonality In Aod and Surface Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 shows that the measured surface concentrations exhibit only a fraction of the seasonality in the column AOD observed by the satellite instruments, suggesting that changes in surface concentrations do not dictate the seasonality observed in AOD. This is in agreement with Alston et al (2012), who show that the summertime enhancement in surface PM 2.5 in Georgia is considerably less than the AOD enhancement over the region. This presents an intriguing disconnect between surface and column measurements of aerosol loading in the SEUS.…”
Section: Seasonality In Aod and Surface Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is consistent with Alston et al (2012), who find a threefold increase in summertime AOD over wintertime, although they use a finer resolution product and therefore show greater spatial variability. The magnitude of both the seasonal mean and the relative enhancement differs among instruments as shown in the figure, but is spatially consistent.…”
Section: Seasonality In Aod and Surface Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Habib et al (2006) found by using the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer absorbing aerosol index data sets that the absorbing aerosol column burdens averaged over April-May of 1981-1992 exhibited a RSD of 16-30 % in different regions of India. Alston et al (2012) showed by using ground-based measurements at 41 sites in the southeastern United States (29 sites of PM 2.5 measurements provided by Environmental Protection Agency and 12 sites by Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources) that monthly mean PM 2.5 concentrations in that region had APDM values of 5-10 % over 2000-2009.…”
Section: Q Mu and H Liao: Simulation Of The Interannual Variations mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observational and modeling studies have reported high aerosol concentrations in the eastern United States (US) (Malm 2004;Park et al 2003Park et al , 2004Walker et al 2012), eastern China (Zhang et al 2012b;Wang et al 2013;Mu and Liao 2014), and Europe (Megaritis et al 2014;Andersson et al 2007) as a result of the large anthropogenic emissions of aerosols and aerosol precursors in these regions (Dutkiewicz et al 2000;Vestreng et al 2007;Hand et al 2012;Mijling et al 2013). Previous studies also showed that the interannual variations (IAVs) of aerosols were significant in the eastern US (Alston et al 2012), eastern China (Yang et al 2011;Mu and Liao 2014), and Europe (Andersson et al 2007). The IAVs in aerosol concentrations were found to be sensitive to the IAVs in anthropogenic emissions of aerosols and aerosol precursors (Mylona 1996;Irie 2005;Ohara et al 2007;Vestreng et al 2007;Xing et al 2013) and in meteorological conditions, since the meteorology modulates the processes of dilution, transport, deposition, and chemical reaction (Andersson et al 2007;Zhao et al 2012;Mu and Liao 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%