Volume 3: Advanced Fabrication and Manufacturing; Emerging Technology Frontiers; Energy, Health and Water- Applications of Nano 2015
DOI: 10.1115/ipack2015-48587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Carbon Nanotube Forest Interfaces Using Time Domain Thermoreflectance

Abstract: Forests comprised of nominally vertically aligned carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are excellent candidates for thermal interface materials (TIMs) due to their theoretically predicted outstanding thermal and mechanical properties. Unfortunately, due to challenges in the synthesis and characterization of these materials reports of the thermal conductivity and thermal contact resistance of CNT forests have varied widely and typically fallen far short of theoretical predictions. In particular, the micro- and nano-length s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anisotropic heat conduction in CVD diamond has attracted great attention because it affects the ability of extracting heat through conduction. , However, almost all experimental measurements have been focused on two-dimensional (2D) anisotropy of thermal conduction. , Three-dimensional anisotropy has not been reported before experimentally due to difficulties in thermal measurements. TDTR is a popular noncontact optical pump and probe thermal characterization method used to measure thermal properties of both bulk and nanostructured materials. A modulated pump beam heats a sample periodically, and a probe beam measures the temperature of the sample surface through a change in reflectance (i.e., thermoreflectance). The probe beam delay time is controlled by a mechanical stage, which is used to create a temperature decay curve from 0.1 to 5 ns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anisotropic heat conduction in CVD diamond has attracted great attention because it affects the ability of extracting heat through conduction. , However, almost all experimental measurements have been focused on two-dimensional (2D) anisotropy of thermal conduction. , Three-dimensional anisotropy has not been reported before experimentally due to difficulties in thermal measurements. TDTR is a popular noncontact optical pump and probe thermal characterization method used to measure thermal properties of both bulk and nanostructured materials. A modulated pump beam heats a sample periodically, and a probe beam measures the temperature of the sample surface through a change in reflectance (i.e., thermoreflectance). The probe beam delay time is controlled by a mechanical stage, which is used to create a temperature decay curve from 0.1 to 5 ns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the excellent contact at the interfaces improves the thermal contact resistance between the VGNs and substrates. By utilizing a time-domain reflectance (TDTR) method (Figure S15 and Table S1), the thermal contact resistance between the VGNs and substrates was measured to be 3.39 × 10 –9 m 2 ·K·W –1 , which was orders of magnitude lower than those reported in previous reports, as shown in Figure f. , The thermal conductivity of the VGNs was also measured to be 5.16 W·m –1 ·K –1 , which was much higher than that of the commonly used commercial TCTs. According to the classic thermal conductive theory, the thermal contact resistance is mainly determined by the contact area (Figure S16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The biggest challenge for this sandwiched sample configuration to work is the weak bonding between the CNT/Al interface through the van der Waals force, resulting in an ultra-low thermal conductance (G) that could make the measurements insensitive to the thermal conductivity of the CNT samples. 3,[20][21][22] We find that the sensitivity to the cross-plane thermal conductivity could be lower than 0.05 when G=1.0 MW/(m 2 K), as shown in Figure S2a. Here the sensitivity coefficient is defined as , where is the parameter that we are interested in and / is the detected signal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%