1990
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-136-3-431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Enterobacteria by Esterase Specific-Activity Profiles

Abstract: The spectrum of specific activities and the electrophoretic mobilities of esterases produced by 550 strains of Enterobacteriaceae belonging to 36 species and subclassified into six groups (group 1, Escherichia cofi, Shi'geflu and Escherichia hermanii; group 2, genus Sizfmoneffa and genus Citrobacter; group 3, genus Kfebsieffa and genus Enterobacter; group 4, genus Serrutiu and Serratia fonticolu; group 5, genus Proteus, genus Protridenct'a and genus Motgunelfa; and group 6, genus Yersiniu) were analysed by acr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 from the mother strain, with only one band and a migration front (M r) value of 55. Since the latter enzymes have been described as among the most discriminating enzymes in various taxonomic studies [11,25], this analysis suggests that there were little or no differences between the 22 single-spore strains and the mother strain ORS 140102 which can be therefore considered as a pure strain if the pigmentation and colony morphology variations can be ascribed to physiological variations (such as inoculum effects, even though the inoculation techniques were as standardized as possible) but not genetic factors. 1) Consequently, the 23 strains tested had the same zymotype for malate dehydrogenase and esterases (Fig.…”
Section: Enzyme Electrophoretic Comparison Of the Single-spore Culturesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 from the mother strain, with only one band and a migration front (M r) value of 55. Since the latter enzymes have been described as among the most discriminating enzymes in various taxonomic studies [11,25], this analysis suggests that there were little or no differences between the 22 single-spore strains and the mother strain ORS 140102 which can be therefore considered as a pure strain if the pigmentation and colony morphology variations can be ascribed to physiological variations (such as inoculum effects, even though the inoculation techniques were as standardized as possible) but not genetic factors. 1) Consequently, the 23 strains tested had the same zymotype for malate dehydrogenase and esterases (Fig.…”
Section: Enzyme Electrophoretic Comparison Of the Single-spore Culturesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Electrophoretic profiles (after horizontal acrylarnideagarose gel electrophoresis) of fl-naphthyl propionate esterase from the mother strain (M) and three of the single-spore strains [11][12][13], after cultivation on BAP medium. Electrophoretic profiles (after horizontal acrylarnideagarose gel electrophoresis) of fl-naphthyl propionate esterase from the mother strain (M) and three of the single-spore strains [11][12][13], after cultivation on BAP medium.…”
Section: Enzyme Electrophoretic Comparison Of the Single-spore Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Electrophoretic characterization of enzyme allelic polymorphism is generally performed using starch gel electrophoresis [1], or polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [5]. However, the electrophoretic resolution in starch gels is not always optimal, and the analysis of sizeable numbers of enzymes in large numbers of bacterial strains, as required in population genetics, may be rather time‐consuming and tedious with such methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Cocaine esterase was induced by cocaine, since specific activities of the enzyme in crude extracts from cells of P. maltophilia [14]). Sections of an unstained gel run under identical conditions were assayed for cocaine esterase activity by incubation with cocaine (2 mM in 1 ml of 50 mM MOPS buffer, pH 7.0, 30°C), and the reaction was monitored by HPLC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%