2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-015-0220-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase and admixture in Australian and Canadian goats

Abstract: BackgroundBasic understanding of linkage disequilibrium (LD) and population structure, as well as the consistency of gametic phase across breeds is crucial for genome-wide association studies and successful implementation of genomic selection. However, it is still limited in goats. Therefore, the objectives of this research were: (i) to estimate genome-wide levels of LD in goat breeds using data generated with the Illumina Goat SNP50 BeadChip; (ii) to study the consistency of gametic phase across breeds in ord… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
77
2
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
18
77
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with our results, Al-Mamun et al (2015) reported that the maximum average LD was located between adjacent SNPs on OAR10 and a higher average LD was seen in meat sheep breeds. Values of r 2 for adjacent SNP pairs were also similar to the values observed in other livestock species such as cattle (r 2 = 0.20 for SNPs with an average distance of 68 Kb) (Bohmanova et al, 2010) and goats (r 2 = 0.11 to 0.29 for SNPs with physical distance ranging from 53 to 73 kb) (Brito et al, 2015), although these were lower than those observed in pigs, where one study reported an average r 2 of 0.41 to 0.46 for SNPs <50 kb apart (Veroneze et al, 2013), and in horses (Corbin et al, 2010), which showed r 2 values remaining >0.3 for distances up to 185 kb. The relatively small number of genotyped Barbaresca individuals may have resulted in an overestimation of r 2 , which could explain the differences in the LD values v. the other Sicilian sheep breeds (Mastrangelo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Consistent with our results, Al-Mamun et al (2015) reported that the maximum average LD was located between adjacent SNPs on OAR10 and a higher average LD was seen in meat sheep breeds. Values of r 2 for adjacent SNP pairs were also similar to the values observed in other livestock species such as cattle (r 2 = 0.20 for SNPs with an average distance of 68 Kb) (Bohmanova et al, 2010) and goats (r 2 = 0.11 to 0.29 for SNPs with physical distance ranging from 53 to 73 kb) (Brito et al, 2015), although these were lower than those observed in pigs, where one study reported an average r 2 of 0.41 to 0.46 for SNPs <50 kb apart (Veroneze et al, 2013), and in horses (Corbin et al, 2010), which showed r 2 values remaining >0.3 for distances up to 185 kb. The relatively small number of genotyped Barbaresca individuals may have resulted in an overestimation of r 2 , which could explain the differences in the LD values v. the other Sicilian sheep breeds (Mastrangelo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The dataset used here has been previously described [19, 24]. In brief, there were between 48 (Cashmere) and 403 (Alpine) animals genotyped per breed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the heterogeneity of effective population size (N e ) among breeds can potentially contribute to large locus-specific F ST values among breed groups [18]. Using the same dataset, Brito et al [19] reported a variation in N e among the breeds included in this investigation. Therefore, the approach named hapFLK, proposed by Fariello et al [20] and based on haplotype differentiation between populations, seems like another reasonable alternative to confirm or identify signatures of selection in goat populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Following LD pruning, there should be no SNP pair within a given window, usually 50 kb, that are correlated, taken as r 2 >0.2 (Anderson et al, 2010). The SNP density obtained before LD-based filtering (1 SNP/~59 kb) was lower than the densities of 1 SNP/~53 SNP obtained for Alpine and Saanen goats, but higher than the densities of 1 SNP/~67kb and 1 SNP/~71kb for SA Boer and Toggenburg goats, respectively (Brito et al, 2014). SNP densities obtained after LD-based filtering (1 SNP/~226kb), however, were considerably lower than the original average inter-SNP distance range of 30 -90 kb, as stated by Tosser-Klopp et al (2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%