2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Variability of Epstein-Barr Virus Genes in Nasopharyngeal Biopsies: Potential Predictors for Carcinoma Progression

Abstract: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is a significant factor in the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, especially in the undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type (UCNT, World Health Organization type III), which is the dominant histopathological type in high-risk areas. The major EBV oncogene is latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1). LMP1 gene shows variability with different tumorigenic and immunogenic potentials. EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) regulates progression of EBV-related tumors; however, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,9 Workup for NPC may include EBV testing of both the tumor itself and the blood, particularly in the presence of nonkeratinizing and undifferentiated histology. [10][11][12] Testing methods for detection of EBV in the tumor include in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded RNA 13 and immunohistochemical staining for LMP1. 14 The former tends to be a more sensitive testing method for carcinomas, relative to LMP1 immunohistochemical staining.…”
Section: Epstein-barr Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Workup for NPC may include EBV testing of both the tumor itself and the blood, particularly in the presence of nonkeratinizing and undifferentiated histology. [10][11][12] Testing methods for detection of EBV in the tumor include in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded RNA 13 and immunohistochemical staining for LMP1. 14 The former tends to be a more sensitive testing method for carcinomas, relative to LMP1 immunohistochemical staining.…”
Section: Epstein-barr Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Recently, many other kinds of prognostic factors have been found for NPC, including Epstein-Barr virus oncogene subvariant; leucinerich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains gene status and its mRNA and protein expression levels; the maximum standard uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography; and tumor diameter. [7][8][9][10][11] However, the majority of these factors are not suitable for clinical practice for various reasons, such as having a high cost or low specificity. A more accurate appraisal system is urgently needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBV can be classified into two main genotypes, A and B, or types 1 and 2, based on sequence divergence in the nuclear proteins, Epstein Barr Nuclear Antigen (EBNA)-1, -2, -3A, -3B, and 3C [22]. However, EBNA-2 is generally used for the classification because the protein has the least percentage of sequence homology between the two genotypes [23,24].…”
Section: Classification and Geographical Distribution Of Ebvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two genotypes also vary in biological properties; EBV type 1 is more efficient in immortalizing B cells and the type 2 has a higher lytic ability [26,27]. The virus is further classified into seven different strains: China 1 (C1), China 2 (C2), China 3 (C3), Mediterranean with (Med+) or without (Med-) deletions, Alaskan (AL), and North Carolina, based on nucleotide polymorphism, 30 bp deletions, or signature amino acid changes in the LMP1 gene as compared to the sequence of a prototype EBV, B95-8 [22,28]. The different strains show diversity in tumorigenic activity; a 30 bp deletion at the carboxyl terminal, for example, has a higher tumorigenic activity and poor immunogenicity compared to the undeleted variant [29].…”
Section: Classification and Geographical Distribution Of Ebvmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation