Characterization of vascular permeability using a biomimetic microfluidic blood vessel model

Abstract

The inflammatory response in endothelial cells (ECs) leads to an increase in vascular permeability through the formation of gaps. However, the dynamic nature of vascular permeability and external factors involved is still elusive. In this work, we use a biomimetic blood vessel (BBV) microfluidic model to measure in real-time the change in permeability of the EC layer under culture in physiologically relevant flow conditions. This platform studies the dynamics and characterizes vascular permeability when the EC layer is triggered with an inflammatory agent using tracer molecules of three different sizes, and the results are compared to a transwell insert study. We also apply an analytical model to compare the permeability data from the different tracer molecules to understand the physiological and bio-transport significance of endothelial permeability based on the molecule of interest. A computational model of the BBV model is also built to understand the factors influencing transport of molecules of different sizes under flow. The endothelial monolayer cultured under flow in the BBV model was treated with thrombin, a serine protease that induces a rapid and reversible increase in endothelium permeability. On analysis of permeability data, it is found that the transport characteristics for fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) dye and FITC Dextran 4k Da molecules are similar in both BBV and transwell models, but FITC Dextran 70k Da molecules show increased permeability in the BBV model as convection flow (Peclet number > 1) influences the molecule transport in the BBV model. We also calculated from permeability data the relative increase in intercellular gap area during thrombin treatment for ECs in the BBV and transwell insert models to be between 12% and 15%. This relative increase was found to be within range of what we quantified from F-actin stained EC layer images. The work highlights the importance of incorporating flow in in vitro vascular models, especially in studies involving transport of large size objects such as antibodies, proteins, nano/micro particles, and cells. Published by AIP Publishing.

Multiplexed blood–brain barrier organ-on-chip

“…Reported values for 4 kDa FITC dextran were in the range of 5-13 × 10 −6 cm s −1 and 0.45-∼2 × 10 −6 cm s −1 for 20 kDa molecules. 31,45,[51][52][53] However, these reported permeability values are still higher than those reported in vivo, 54 where the permeability was 0.92 × 10 −6 cm s −1 and 0.24 × 10 −6 cm s −1 for 4 kDa and 20 kDa, respectively.…”

Examining metastatic behavior within 3D bioprinted vasculature for the validation of a 3D computational flow model

“…While much of the current work in this area has focused on the development of computational models, validation methods are currently limited to primarily microfluidic devices ( 9 ). Conventional microfluidic chips, which mimic vascular geometries using molded channels, do not have most of the important characteristics found in vivo, such as tubular channels and vessel compliance, severely limiting their ability to reproduce the vascular dilation and contraction in response to flow pressure changes that are found in biological systems.…”

Flow dynamics control endothelial permeability in a microfluidic vessel bifurcation model

“…In vitro microvascular models, on the other hand, provide functional and potentially high-throughput study tools that enable the measurements of endothelial permeability under controlled biophysical and biochemical stimuli. [23][24][25][26][27] In this context, microfluidic techniques provide a variety of platforms for studying endothelial barrier function while faithfully preserving the hemodynamic conditions, the three dimensional (3D) endothelial-extracellular matrix (ECM) interface topology, and the length scales of an intact blood vessel. [27][28][29][30] However, previously described microfluidic models of vascular function are most commonly straight microchannels embedded within or laterally adjacent to semi-porous ECM.…”