2009
DOI: 10.1051/agro:2008063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing potential flexibility in grassland use. Application to the French Aubrac area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The flexibility index was also found to be independent of the production-diversity trade-off and significantly influenced by grassland types, suggesting differences among grassland types in flexibility of timing of use. Moreover, the flexibility index was greater in pastures, which is consistent with grazing producing more flexible vegetation regarding the optimal time of use for forage quality (Martin et al 2009). …”
Section: Agronomic and Environmental Properties According To Managementsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The flexibility index was also found to be independent of the production-diversity trade-off and significantly influenced by grassland types, suggesting differences among grassland types in flexibility of timing of use. Moreover, the flexibility index was greater in pastures, which is consistent with grazing producing more flexible vegetation regarding the optimal time of use for forage quality (Martin et al 2009). …”
Section: Agronomic and Environmental Properties According To Managementsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Our results are in line with recent research. They complement studies estimating a theoretical potential allowed by diversity at the parcel or forage system scales (Martin et al 2009, Jacquot 2012) by extending them for summer pastures and by showing how diversity can be leveraged by shepherds in practical terms. Other criteria conferring resilience identified in our template (Table 3) were already known and taken into account in the field, for example:…”
Section: Contribution To Livestock Farming Systems Researchmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Therefore, they are limited regarding the representation of the biological source of adaptation of the system and the representation of individual variability. Extending SIGHMA by integrating a generic representation of decision-making processes (MartinClouaire and Rellier, 2009) would make it possible to study adaptive management (Darnhofer, 2009). It would open promising perspectives to more fully explore the regulating properties of livestock systems based on both the biological and management components.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%