ChatGPT and large language model (LLM) chatbots: The current state of acceptability and a proposal for guidelines on utilization in academic medicine

Kim, Jin Kyu; Chua, Michael; Rickard, Mandy; Lorenzo, Armando J.

doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.05.018

Cited by 72 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While a joint stance against any use of ChatGPT in orthopaedic academic publishing was published [1], several other fields in academic writing have been more welcoming to the benefits of chatbots, with a substantial body of literature on how to more correctly utilise ChatGPT in scholarly writing [2, 11, 12].…”

Section: The Current Stance Of the Scientific Community On Chatgptmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…ChatGPT has been reported and projected to be successfully used for language editing and stylistic purposes [2, 18]. Its application in manuscript ‘polishing’ could enhance authors’ productivity by sparing them time in writing.…”

Section: Language Barrier Remains a Major Problem In The Borderless W...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other hand, there have been significant editorial concerns related to even the slightest use of ChatGPT in academic publishing, with some researchers asserting that it may compromise the integrity of scholarly writing [1]. Some journals have also made it obligatory for authors to report any use of ChatGPT before completing a submission, either in the methods section or as an acknowledgement [1, 2]. AI tools should not necessarily be condemned outright as potential threats to academic integrity.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Embrace responsible ChatGPT usage to overcome language barriers in academic writing

Kayaalp,

Ollivier,

Winkler

et al. 2023

Knee surg. sports traumatol. arthrosc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: The Current Stance Of the Scientific Community On Chatgptmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Language Barrier Remains a Major Problem In The Borderless W...mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Embrace responsible ChatGPT usage to overcome language barriers in academic writing

Kayaalp,

Ollivier,

Winkler

et al. 2023

Knee surg. sports traumatol. arthrosc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…13 Other papers have mentioned the position of GAI and its influence on medical academic writing. 14,15 However, limited research has been conducted on the prevalence and content of GAI policies in Korean medical academic publishing. This gap in knowledge underscores the importance of examining the current landscape of GAI-related author guidelines in Korean medical journals to inform future policy development and implementation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Generative AI Guidelines in Korean Medical Journals: A Survey Using Human-AI Collaboration

Ahn

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundGenerative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools, such as large language models, have the potential to revolutionize medical research and writing, but their use also raises important ethical and practical concerns. This study examines the prevalence and content of GAI guidelines among Korean medical journals to assess the current landscape and inform future policy development.MethodsTop 100 Korean medical journals by H-index were surveyed. Author guidelines were collected and screened by a human author and AI chatbot to identify GAI-related content. Key components of GAI policies were extracted and compared across journals. Journal characteristics associated with GAI guideline adoption were also analyzed.ResultsOnly 18% of the surveyed journals had GAI guidelines, which is much lower than previously reported international journals. However, adoption rates increased over time, reaching 57.1% in the first quarter of 2024. Higher-impact journals were more likely to have GAI guidelines. All journals with GAI guidelines required authors to declare GAI use, and 94.4% prohibited AI authorship. Key policy components included emphasizing human responsibility (72.2%), discouraging AI-generated content (44.4%), and exempting basic AI tools (38.9%).ConclusionWhile GAI guideline adoption among Korean medical journals is lower than global trends, there is a clear increase in implementation over time. The key components of these guidelines align with international standards, but greater standardization and collaboration are needed to ensure responsible and ethical use of GAI in medical research and writing.Abstract Figure

show abstract

“…We used ChatGPT (OpenAI) [3] to gauge the current state of the RV continuum. According to ChatGPT, the continuum is often divided into several main categories (note, we adapted the ChatGPT results and enhanced it with concrete examples, where necessary; Textbox 1 [4]). The original ChatGPT transcript is shown in Multimedia Appendix 1 [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What is Diminished Virtuality? A Directional and Layer-Based Taxonomy for the Reality-Virtuality Continuum

Egger,

Gsaxner,

Kleesiek

et al. 2024

JMIR XR Spatial Comput

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concept of reality-virtuality (RV) continuum was introduced by Paul Milgram and Fumio Kishino in 1994. It describes a spectrum that ranges from a purely physical reality (the real world) to a purely virtual reality (a completely computer-generated environment), with various degrees of mixed reality in between. This continuum is “realized” by different types of displays to encompass different levels of immersion and interaction, allowing for the classification of different types of environments and experiences. What is often overlooked in this concept is the act of diminishing real objects (or persons, animals, etc) from the reality, that is, a diminution, rather than augmenting it, that is, an augmentation. Hence, we want to propose in this contribution an update or modification of the RV continuum where the diminished reality aspect is more prominent. We hope this will help users, especially those who are new to the field, to get a better understanding of the entire extended reality (XR) topic, as well as assist in the decision-making for hardware (devices) and software or algorithms that are needed for new diminished reality applications. However, we also propose another, more sophisticated directional and layer-based taxonomy for the RV continuum that we believe goes beyond the mediated and multimediated realities. Furthermore, we initiate the question of whether the RV continuum truly ends on one side with physical reality.

show abstract

ChatGPT and large language model (LLM) chatbots: The current state of acceptability and a proposal for guidelines on utilization in academic medicine

Cited by 72 publications

References 22 publications

Embrace responsible ChatGPT usage to overcome language barriers in academic writing

Embrace responsible ChatGPT usage to overcome language barriers in academic writing

Generative AI Guidelines in Korean Medical Journals: A Survey Using Human-AI Collaboration

What is Diminished Virtuality? A Directional and Layer-Based Taxonomy for the Reality-Virtuality Continuum

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About