1974
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/7/20/003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical potentials and workfunctions of metal surfaces in the theory of an inhomogeneous electron gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the correlation potential is most obvious in the work function, obtained from the KS Fermi energy of the slab relative to the electrostatic potential in the middle of the vacuum region. 34,35 Table I lists the LDA and GGA work functions, both including and without correlation (for the GGA the PBEsol form 36 has been applied). The LDA and GGA values are in good agreement with the [38][39][40][41] given the dependence of the work function on a and the various other technical parameters.…”
Section: Comparison Of Exx and Lda Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the correlation potential is most obvious in the work function, obtained from the KS Fermi energy of the slab relative to the electrostatic potential in the middle of the vacuum region. 34,35 Table I lists the LDA and GGA work functions, both including and without correlation (for the GGA the PBEsol form 36 has been applied). The LDA and GGA values are in good agreement with the [38][39][40][41] given the dependence of the work function on a and the various other technical parameters.…”
Section: Comparison Of Exx and Lda Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the only energy of the full KS spectrum which has a physical significance is precisely the energy of the highest occupied level, which can be identified with . 52 The work function for a slab with r s = 2.07 and d =4 F is shown schematically in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Work Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former definition is appropriate for slab calculations where a vacuum region is explicitly included in the model. Thus, the work function is most commonly evaluated by 72,73 …”
Section: Work Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%