2015
DOI: 10.1080/14781158.2015.995612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

China's rise and the ‘Chinese dream’ in international relations theory

Abstract: The rise of China/East Asia and the perceived decline of the US/West pose an emerging question about how International Relations (IR) Theory should respond to this change. Increasingly, there have been heated discussions within the Chinese IR academia over a desirable Chinese contribution to IR Theory, particularly the possibility of building a distinctive Chinese IR Theory. Inevitably, this drive towards theorizing from Chinese perspectives also creates backlash among not only Western but also other Chinese s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing literature has pointed out that surging discourses on indigenous theory building in China, Japan, and India have something to do with the rise and/or resurgence of these powers in world politics and the growing interests of the global epistemic communities in their worldviews and perspectives on IR (e.g. Do, 2015, 2020; Rösch and Watanabe, 2018; Wang, 2013; Yan, 2011). As Kristensen (2019) argues, “states of emergence” such as China and India can help produce “states of knowledge” through increased research funding, growing international attention and recognition, as well as the heightened confidence of national IR communities.…”
Section: The Power–knowledge Nexus and Its Relevance To Asiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing literature has pointed out that surging discourses on indigenous theory building in China, Japan, and India have something to do with the rise and/or resurgence of these powers in world politics and the growing interests of the global epistemic communities in their worldviews and perspectives on IR (e.g. Do, 2015, 2020; Rösch and Watanabe, 2018; Wang, 2013; Yan, 2011). As Kristensen (2019) argues, “states of emergence” such as China and India can help produce “states of knowledge” through increased research funding, growing international attention and recognition, as well as the heightened confidence of national IR communities.…”
Section: The Power–knowledge Nexus and Its Relevance To Asiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the domestic perspective, China's foreign and security policy can be traced back to how the country conceptualised power, responsibility, and grand strategy. What interesting is how in the recent years, the rise of China/East Asia is synonymous with the emerging of Chinese International Relations Theory (IRT) (Do 2015). The debates frequently centre on the concept of 'Chinese dream,' a term closely associated with Xi Jinping's 2012 campaign.…”
Section: National Conceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before Xi Jinping, 'Chinese dream' is corresponded with the hope for restoring China's earlier dynasties' greatness of literary and intellectual history. In the "China's rise and the 'Chinese dream' in international relations theory", They T. Do (2015) has made a comprehensive summary on the recent debates regarding the 'Chinese dream' (Zhōngguó Mèng).…”
Section: National Conceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The legitimacy of rulers was thus to a large extent performance-based. The Chinese government has actively facilitated the work of scholars including Qin Yaqing [55], Yan Xuetong [78], and Zhao Tingyang [81] who have embraced traditional Confucian ideas to justify CCP rule and China's domestic and foreign policies, including notions such as China's "peaceful development" and "harmonious world" [19,33].…”
Section: Sino-centric Order and Human Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%