2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.03.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chitosan lactate wafer as a platform for the buccal delivery of tizanidine HCl: In vitro and in vivo performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ion spray voltage was adjusted at 3000 V. The common parameters were as follows: nebulizer gas pressure was 45 psi, gas temperature was 275 C and gas flow rate was 8 l/min. The analysis was carried out at the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, and its MS parameters were as follows: precursor ion (Da) was 254.1 and 326.5 for TIZ and tolterodine, respectively, whereas product ion (Da) was 44.2 and 147.2 for TIZ and tolterodine, respectively (El-Mahrouk et al, 2014).…”
Section: Lc-ms/ms Assay Of Tizmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ion spray voltage was adjusted at 3000 V. The common parameters were as follows: nebulizer gas pressure was 45 psi, gas temperature was 275 C and gas flow rate was 8 l/min. The analysis was carried out at the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, and its MS parameters were as follows: precursor ion (Da) was 254.1 and 326.5 for TIZ and tolterodine, respectively, whereas product ion (Da) was 44.2 and 147.2 for TIZ and tolterodine, respectively (El-Mahrouk et al, 2014).…”
Section: Lc-ms/ms Assay Of Tizmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLGA-based wafers, coated with a mucoadhesive layer of starch, NaCMC or Carbopol ® 971P, showed good adhesive properties and were able to release antimicrobial agents with a zero-order release kinetics [159]. Wafers of tizanidine were prepared by incorporation of chitosan lactate beads, cross-linked with sodium tripolyphosphate, into chitosan lactate solution followed by lyophilization [160]. Mucoadhesion to the buccal mucosa was maintained for 8 h without irritation.…”
Section: Wafersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vivo mucoadhesive performance test was carried out in three healthy volunteers aged 20–35 years. The buccal tablets (n=3) were adhered, just above the canine tooth, to the gingival mucosa by pressing for 30 s onto mucosa and kept for a period of 16 h 24. The volunteers were claimed to note:

The adhesion time: time required for the tablet to detach from the buccal mucosal surface

The adhesion strength (unadhesive, slightly adhesive, adhesive or very adhesive)

Any irritation signs (non-irritant, slight, moderate or severe)

Bitter taste as a result of BH.2HCl swallowing (non, slight, moderate or very)

The mucoadhesive tablet disintegration in the buccal cavity (non, slight, moderate or high)

…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%