2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00228-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chitosan nanoparticles containing plasmid DNA encoding house dust mite allergen, Der p 1 for oral vaccination in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Other studies show that chitosan nanoparticles can be used for oral immunization to induce a specific immune response. 23,24 More recently, Ghendon et al 25 found chitosan to act as an adjuvant during immunization, as addition of chitosan to the antigen injected parentally resulted in a 4 or 6-10-fold increase in antibody titres after a single dose or with two doses in the case of IM immunization of mice. Other in vivo studies report appreciable protein expression using chitosan as condensing carrier for plasmid delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Other studies show that chitosan nanoparticles can be used for oral immunization to induce a specific immune response. 23,24 More recently, Ghendon et al 25 found chitosan to act as an adjuvant during immunization, as addition of chitosan to the antigen injected parentally resulted in a 4 or 6-10-fold increase in antibody titres after a single dose or with two doses in the case of IM immunization of mice. Other in vivo studies report appreciable protein expression using chitosan as condensing carrier for plasmid delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Th1 disease models such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis or diabetes, treatment via oral tolerance induction is associated with a shift toward a Th2 immune response (12,20). In contrast, in allergy models, which are characterized by a Th2 cytokine profile, tolerance induction led to a suppression of the Th2 response (21,30,36), which was also observed by Roy et al and Chew et al using allergen-encoding chitosan-DNA NP (13,35).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Mucoadhesive chitosan microparticles represent a promising formulation for use in sublingual allergy vaccines. In other studies, chitosan nanoparticles, containing plasmid DNA encoding the HDM allergen Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus 2 (Der p2) 100 or Der p1, 101 induced IFN-c in serum and prevented subsequent sensitization of Th2 cell-regulated allergen-specific IgE responses following oral vaccination in mice. The data on Der p2 also indicate that oral administration of chitosan-Der p2 DNA nanoparticles results in the expression of Der p2 by epithelial cells in both the stomach and small intestine.…”
Section: Ctb-agmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…95 Der f-CS nanovaccine/i.n. ; 98 chitosan-pDer p2 100 or pDer p1 nanoparticles/oral 101 Mucoadhesive chitosan-formulated OVA/sublingual 99 Antigen-probiotics Co-administration/oral 102 and i.n. 104 Recombinant Der p1 111-139 105 and Bet v 1 107 producing probiotics/i.n.…”
Section: Combination Effect Animal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%