2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool to identify drought stress in Acer genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
54
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
9
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Grown under 5 and 30 min nutrient spraying intervals, F v /F m ratios of M. crystallinum were close or above 0.8 while plants grown under 60 and 240 min had their F v /F m ratio below 0.8 (Fig 6A), which may indicate reduced maximal quantum yield of PS II, resulting from drought stress [61]. However, some researchers pointed out that the F v /F m ratio may be suitable for drought sensitive species but not for drought insensitive species [62,63]. Li et al [64] reported that a severe drought episode during the peak vegetative growth stage of maize plants resulted in decreases in Chl content, F v /F m ratio, qP but increases in NPQ.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Grown under 5 and 30 min nutrient spraying intervals, F v /F m ratios of M. crystallinum were close or above 0.8 while plants grown under 60 and 240 min had their F v /F m ratio below 0.8 (Fig 6A), which may indicate reduced maximal quantum yield of PS II, resulting from drought stress [61]. However, some researchers pointed out that the F v /F m ratio may be suitable for drought sensitive species but not for drought insensitive species [62,63]. Li et al [64] reported that a severe drought episode during the peak vegetative growth stage of maize plants resulted in decreases in Chl content, F v /F m ratio, qP but increases in NPQ.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Overall, La effects on photosynthetic pigments could be time-dependent. Effect of La on Chl fluorescence parameters: Chl fluorescence parameters reflect the physiology and mechanism of photosynthesis, which are not only the indicator of the light-use efficiency, but the evaluation index of the plant under environmental stresses (Janka et al 2013, Guo et al 2015, Banks 2018, Hanelt 2018, Dai and Shan 2019. Fv/Fm exhibits the maximal efficiency of PSII photochemistry, which is stable in general.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chlorophyll fluorescence has been shown to be a viable quantitative indicator of drought stress and survival (Woo et al 2008;Jedmowski et al 2015;Kalaji et al 2017;Banks 2018). Measurements were performed on leaf material from both the whole-tree drought and foliar dehydration.…”
Section: Chlorophyll Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…F 0 at T0 was used during this study (Banks 2017). The sensitivity of Fv/Fm is known to vary in response to drought stress (Banks 2018), researchers should use caution relying on this parameter alone for drought trials particularly when stress is not severe. Time for the chlorophyll fluorescence parameter Fv/Fm to decline by 50% was calculated per tree, using a linear regression and results per tree were subsequently analysed (Drought n = 5 R 2 = 0.85 ± 0.21, Dehydrated n = 10 average R 2 = 0.79 ± 0.11).…”
Section: Chlorophyll Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%