2000
DOI: 10.1080/000368400404263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice of mortgage instrument, liquidity constraints and the demand for housing debt in the UK

Abstract: The research uses microdata to estimate reduced form mortgage demand equations based on truncated regressions, dissagregated by choice of mortgage instrument. The choice is between a standard annuity mortgage and a balloon type mortgage (the endowment). The estimates are used to indicate the differential impact of credit market rationing and financial liberalization on households. The results indicate significant variations in mortgage demand by choice of mortgage instrument. Econometric testing demonstrates t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the inclusion of the regional perspective, the empirical specification follows the analyses of BRUECKNER (1994) and LEECE (2000bLEECE ( , 2006. It is expected that regional variations in incomes and mortgage affordability rates may be reflected by the geographical patterns of mortgage contract decisions.…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the inclusion of the regional perspective, the empirical specification follows the analyses of BRUECKNER (1994) and LEECE (2000bLEECE ( , 2006. It is expected that regional variations in incomes and mortgage affordability rates may be reflected by the geographical patterns of mortgage contract decisions.…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as in the standard logit model, 19 with the only difference being the individual specific effect, α i .…”
Section: Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the demand side, the selection of a specific mortgage contract principally depends on income, house price dynamics and the flexibility of tmortgage contract terms (Campbell and Cocco, 2003;Piskorsky and Thistyi, 2011). Additionally, it may depend on personal and demographic characteristics (Sa-Aadu, and Sirmans, 1995;Ling and McGill, 1998), risk preferences (Brueckner, 1994;1995;Campbell and Cocco, 2003), the opportunity cost of owner occupation (Leece, 2004), interest rate expectations (Leece, 2000a;, liquidity constraints and affordability issues (Leece, 2000b;LaCour-Little, 2009;Bramley and Watkins, 2009). From the supply side, mortgage contract choice is influenced by the institutional features and efficiency of the mortgage finance system (Lanot and Leece, 2014;Leece, 2004;Stephens, 2007;Scanlon and Whitehead, 2011), mortgage pricing and mortgage funding mechanisms (Stephens and Quilgairs, 2008;Ambrose and LaCour-Little, 2001;Loutskina, 2011;Badarinza, et.al., 2013, Campbell, 2013, profitability factors (Vickery, 2006;Petersen, et.al., 2012;Fuster and Vickery, 2013), and macroeconomic issues (Miles, 2004;Whitehead2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%