2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2015.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing conservative therapy in chronic kidney disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Place of death Deaths at home or in a hospice: CKM, 22 of 34 deaths (65 %) Dialysis, 11 of 41 deaths (27 %); p = 0.001 Tam-Tham , 2018, Canada [ 35 ] CKD5 Age ≥ 65 at inclusion Age 65 to < 75 (n, %) Dialysis, 228 (45.6) CKM, 45 (13.3) Age 75 to < 85 (n, %) Dialysis, 220 (44.0) CKM, 143 (42.3) Age ≥ 85 (n, %) Dialysis, 52 (10.4) CKM, 150 (44.4) CKM, 338 Dialysis, 500 Mortality Dialysis vs. CKM (0–3 years), HR: 0.56 (95 % CI: 0.44–0.71); p < 0.001 Dialysis vs. CKM (after 3 years), HR: 1.98 (95 % CI: 1.16–3.37); p = 0.12 Hospitalization Dialysis vs. CKM, HR: 1.40 (95 % CI: 1.16–1.69), p = 0.001 Tan , 2017, Australia [ 27 ] CKD5 Age > 65 at inclusion CKM, 84 Dialysis, 73 CKM, 8 Dialysis, 12 Symptom burden Change (improvement) in mean symptom POS-score over 6 months: CKM, 1.5; dialysis, 7.58; p < 0.002. Teo , 2010, Singapore [ 26 ] CKD5 CKM, 67.4 ± 11.8 HD, 58.7 ± 12.9 CKM, 16 HD, 102 Mortality CKM, HR: 2.29 (95 % CI: 1.16–4.45); HD, HR: 0.59 (95 % CI: 0.33–1.05); p = 0.042 Teruel , 2015, Spain [ 34 ] CKD5 Median age (IQR) Dialysis, 68 (54,76) CKM, 83 (78,86) CKM, 90 Dialysis, 142 Mortality CKM, 8.2/100 patient months; Dialysis, 0.6/100 patient months; p < 0.001 van Loon , 2019, the Netherlands [ 21 ] CKD5 Age ≥ 65 at inclusion CKM, 82 ± 6 Dialysis, 75 ± 7 CKM, 89 Dialysis, 192 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Place of death Deaths at home or in a hospice: CKM, 22 of 34 deaths (65 %) Dialysis, 11 of 41 deaths (27 %); p = 0.001 Tam-Tham , 2018, Canada [ 35 ] CKD5 Age ≥ 65 at inclusion Age 65 to < 75 (n, %) Dialysis, 228 (45.6) CKM, 45 (13.3) Age 75 to < 85 (n, %) Dialysis, 220 (44.0) CKM, 143 (42.3) Age ≥ 85 (n, %) Dialysis, 52 (10.4) CKM, 150 (44.4) CKM, 338 Dialysis, 500 Mortality Dialysis vs. CKM (0–3 years), HR: 0.56 (95 % CI: 0.44–0.71); p < 0.001 Dialysis vs. CKM (after 3 years), HR: 1.98 (95 % CI: 1.16–3.37); p = 0.12 Hospitalization Dialysis vs. CKM, HR: 1.40 (95 % CI: 1.16–1.69), p = 0.001 Tan , 2017, Australia [ 27 ] CKD5 Age > 65 at inclusion CKM, 84 Dialysis, 73 CKM, 8 Dialysis, 12 Symptom burden Change (improvement) in mean symptom POS-score over 6 months: CKM, 1.5; dialysis, 7.58; p < 0.002. Teo , 2010, Singapore [ 26 ] CKD5 CKM, 67.4 ± 11.8 HD, 58.7 ± 12.9 CKM, 16 HD, 102 Mortality CKM, HR: 2.29 (95 % CI: 1.16–4.45); HD, HR: 0.59 (95 % CI: 0.33–1.05); p = 0.042 Teruel , 2015, Spain [ 34 ] CKD5 Median age (IQR) Dialysis, 68 (54,76) CKM, 83 (78,86) CKM, 90 Dialysis, 142 Mortality CKM, 8.2/100 patient months; Dialysis, 0.6/100 patient months; p < 0.001 van Loon , 2019, the Netherlands [ 21 ] CKD5 Age ≥ 65 at inclusion CKM, 82 ± 6 Dialysis, 75 ± 7 CKM, 89 Dialysis, 192 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 By comparison, other developed countries have established dedicated conservative care programs to support patients who do not want to undergo dialysis. [42][43][44][45][46][47] Distinct conservative care programs can be advantageous because of their streamlined efforts to ensure that patients' goals and preferences are honored in health systems where initiation of dialysis is the norm. 14,16,48 In most cases, these models are intended as an alternative to dialysis, and generally only accept patients who have decided not to pursue dialysis.…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 In a Spanish single-center study from the same time period, CCM was provided to 39% of ESKD patients. 32 In 2009, researchers from the ERA-EDTA Registry found that in 11 European countries CCM was provided to 15% of the ESKD patients on average. 4 In the current analysis, we repeated part of this previous ERA-EDTA Registry study using the EDITH Nephrologist survey, but covering more countries and allowing comparison per individual country.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%