“…Several approaches to utilizing ultrasound contrast agents for ambient pressure estimation have been proposed, but high errors (as much as 50 mmHg or 30% relative to the reference standard) associated with these techniques have prevented pre-clinical or clinical applications (Bouakaz et al 1999, Fairbank and Scully 1977, Hök 1981, Miwa 1982, Shankar et al 1986); clinical applications would require errors on the order of 5 mmHg with the reference standard (Pickering et al 2005). One of the other approaches to utilize microbubble based ultrasound contrast agents for ambient pressure estimation is based on the subharmonic signal amplitude and this approach has been tested and used extensively by our group and others (Adam et al 2005, Andersen and Jensen 2009, 2010, Dave et al 2011, 2012a, 2012b, 2012c, Eisenbrey et al 2013, Forsberg et al 2005, Frinking et al 2012, Halldorsdottir et al 2011, 2014, Shi et al 1999). Briefly, this approach relies on eliciting ambient pressure sensitive subharmonic signals, extracting the subharmonic signal amplitude (which is at half the transmit frequency) and then, estimating ambient pressure based on a linear relationship between the subharmonic signal amplitude and the ambient pressure.…”