Citizen Science: Probing the Virtues and Contexts of Participatory Research

Abstract

Citizen science is an increasingly popular activity, from bird counts to amateur water sample collection to air quality monitoring. Researchers and theorists in the field of science and technology studies (STS) have typically applauded these efforts because they make science more participatory, providing an example of the democratization of science, or, at least, more equitable engagement between experts and the lay public. However, a broader review of the literature on citizen science suggests that participation is but one of many virtues that practitioners and observers find in the practices of citizen science. This literature review makes two interventions. First, we discuss the dimensions of citizen science that do not easily fit in a typology or spectrum of participatory practices. We identify seven different virtues claimed of citizen science: increasing scientific data; increasing citizens' scientific literacy and awareness; building community capacity for environmental protection; building more equal relationship between scientists and citizens; filling knowledge gaps and challenging official accounts; driving policy change; and catching polluters. Second, we consider the social and political contexts that often create contradictory situations or dilemmas for citizen scientists. Going forward, a robust framework for the analysis of citizen science would not only address the ways scientific data is collected and put to a particular use, but also situate the project in relation to broader structural forces of scientization, neocolonialism, globalization, and neoliberalization.

Community Science as a Pathway for Resilience in Response to a Public Health Crisis in Flint, Michigan

“…Citizen science provides access to data that might not otherwise be collected, what Hess (2007Hess ( , 2009, Frickel et al (2010), and Woodhouse et al (2002) refer to as "undone science," on a meaningful time scale (McCormick 2012). At the same time, citizen science approaches enhance the legitimacy of scientific approaches to problem solving, or "scientization," whereas community groups may identify different priorities in resolving community challenges (Eden 1996;Lubitow 2013;Welsh and Wynne 2013;Kinchy et al 2014;Kimura and Kinchy 2016;McCauley 2017). Kinchy et al (2014) work shows that most institutionally-led efforts at participatory environmental monitoring do not work to tackle the underlying power structures that lead to environmental inequalities.…”

Contributors’ Withdrawal from Online Collaborative Communities: The Case of OpenStreetMap

“…Every day, millions of people visit websites from online communities like Wikipedia.org or OpenStreetMap.org [1]. Researchers are increasingly referring to these communities as a valuable work force and important source of data [2,3].…”

Shaping Blue Growth: Social Sciences at the Nexus Between Marine Renewables and Energy Policy

“…MRE developers could learn from well-established approaches such as participatory design, co-design, and speculative design, which democratise design by emphasising the importance of location and participation of users and communities (Ehn et al 2014;Kimura and Kinchy 2016).…”