Citizenship, Migration and Mobility in a Pandemic (CMMP): A global dataset of COVID-19 restrictions on human movement

Piccoli, Lorenzo; Ruedin, Didier

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0248066

Cited by 31 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Such research may also reassess the objects of comparison and include more recent crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemican event that entails severe mobility restrictions around the globe (e.g. Piccoli, Dzankic, and Ruedin 2021) and promises to alter our perspective on human movement for many years to come.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Politicising immigration in times of crisis: empirical evidence from Switzerland

Bitschnau

Ader

Ruedin

et al. 2021

Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article investigates the politicisation of immigration in Switzerland during two major socioeconomic crises: the oil crisis of the 1970s and the financial crisis of the late 2000s. Based on 2,853 newspaper claims from 1970 to 1976 and 1995 to 2018, we measure and compare differences in salience, polarisation, actor diversity and frame use between crisis and noncrisis periods. We find that while claims-making on immigration was indeed more salient, polarised, and diversified during the oil crisis, the empirical data for the financial crisis are inconclusive or show a slight decrease. Nonetheless, we still find a noteworthy increase in the use of identity frames during both periods. We conclude that while crises may influence claims-making about immigration and thus affect the politicisation of the matter, their contextual links to particular immigrant groups appear to be of importance as well. Crises do not increase politicisation automatically but may provide important opportunity structures that foster it.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Politicising immigration in times of crisis: empirical evidence from Switzerland

Bitschnau

Ader

Ruedin

et al. 2021

Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A1-External border restrictions: This practice is used in 211 countries and territories [63]. Influenza epidemics were delayed by 1 week and 2 months, respectively, due to international border restrictions.…”

Section: Literature Review On Governmental Intervention Strategiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The priority of this intervention is to separate the unidentified cases from their community members. Internal border restrictions have been applied in 211 countries, including the USA, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippine, UK, Schengen countries, and many others [63].…”

Section: Literature Review On Governmental Intervention Strategiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Hybrid Spherical Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Prioritize Governmental Intervention Strategies against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study from Vietnam

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The unprecedented coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) is fluctuating worldwide. Since the COVID-19 epidemic has a negative impact on all countries and has become a significant threat, it is necessary to determine the most effective strategy for governments by considering a variety of criteria; however, few studies in the literature can assist governments in this topic. Selective governmental intervention during the COVID-19 outbreak is considered a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problem under a vague and uncertain environment when governments and medical communities adjust their priorities in response to rising issues and the efficacy of interventions applied in various nations. In this study, a novel hybrid Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (SF-AHP) and Fuzzy Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS-F) model is proposed to help stakeholders such as governors and policymakers to prioritize governmental interventions for dealing with the COVID-19 outbreak. The SF-AHP is implemented to measure the significance of the criteria, while the WASPAS-F approach is deployed to rank intervention alternatives. An empirical case study is conducted in Vietnam. From the SF-AHP findings, the criteria of “effectiveness in preventing the spread of COVID-19”, “ease of implementation”, and “high acceptability to citizens” were recognized as the most important criteria. As for the ranking of strategies, “vaccinations”, “enhanced control of the country’s health resources”, “common health testing”, “formation of an emergency response team”, and “quarantining patients and those suspected of infection” are the top five strategies. Aside from that, the robustness of the approach was tested by performing a comparative analysis. The results illustrate that the applied methods reach the general best strategy rankings. The applied methodology and its analysis will provide insight to authorities for fighting against the severe pandemic in the long run. It may aid in solving many complicated challenges in government strategy selection and assessment. It is also a flexible design model for considering the evaluation criteria. Finally, this research provides valuable guidance for policymakers in other nations.

show abstract

“…Another controversial issue during the COVID-19 pandemic concerned mobility. The pandemic halted travel and migration in an unprecedented way (Piccoli et al, 2021 ). Asking for views about mobility in light of the pandemic will bring new insight to questions that have motivated scholars for years (De Haas et al, 2020 ).…”

Section: Development Of External Sub-modulesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing a COVID-19 module for the European Social Survey

Hanson

Helbling

Maxwell

et al. 2021

Meas Instrum Soc Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This short report describes the development of a COVID-19 module for Round 10 of the European Social Survey (ESS). The module is formed of 20 items, including 10 agreed with ESS National Coordinators and 10 developed by two academic teams following an external call for content. The majority of ESS participating countries will field the module for Round 10 fieldwork in 2020–2021. This report provides the rationale for the module, presents challenges of developing such a module for ESS, and gives an overview of the question development and testing process. The two external sub-modules—Government authority and legitimacy in the age of a pandemic and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and government rule compliance—are also introduced.

show abstract

Citizenship, Migration and Mobility in a Pandemic (CMMP): A global dataset of COVID-19 restrictions on human movement

Cited by 31 publications

References 7 publications

Politicising immigration in times of crisis: empirical evidence from Switzerland

Politicising immigration in times of crisis: empirical evidence from Switzerland

A Hybrid Spherical Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Prioritize Governmental Intervention Strategies against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study from Vietnam

Developing a COVID-19 module for the European Social Survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About