2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40120-020-00177-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cladribine Tablets and Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Pragmatic, Narrative Review of What Physicians Need to Know

Abstract: Immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) is an emerging management concept for multiple sclerosis, whereby a short course of treatment provides long-lasting suppression of disease activity. ''Cladribine tablets 10 mg'' refers to a total cumulative dose of cladribine given over 2 years (henceforth referred to as cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg); it is a relatively new treatment option that is hypothesised to act as an

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intensive monitoring requirements or the need to visit hospitals for infusions of some DMTs adds to the burden of treatment with some DMTs [ 78 ]. The IRT approach renders these issues moot [ 18 , 36 , 79 , 80 ]: for example, for a patient who responds to treatment with cladribine tablets there is no need for regular intakes of treatment or for continued monitoring beyond 6 months of the last dose (or the recovery of lymphocytes, if this takes longer). This expert group supported this principle, as their support for the use of cladribine tablets in CLARITY-like patients (one relapse in the previous year or 2 relapses in the previous 2 years) was stronger if the patient’s lifestyle preferences mitigated against the use of continuous treatment or if the patient was likely to be non-compliant with this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensive monitoring requirements or the need to visit hospitals for infusions of some DMTs adds to the burden of treatment with some DMTs [ 78 ]. The IRT approach renders these issues moot [ 18 , 36 , 79 , 80 ]: for example, for a patient who responds to treatment with cladribine tablets there is no need for regular intakes of treatment or for continued monitoring beyond 6 months of the last dose (or the recovery of lymphocytes, if this takes longer). This expert group supported this principle, as their support for the use of cladribine tablets in CLARITY-like patients (one relapse in the previous year or 2 relapses in the previous 2 years) was stronger if the patient’s lifestyle preferences mitigated against the use of continuous treatment or if the patient was likely to be non-compliant with this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficacy and the safety/tolerability and monitoring burdens of individual DMDs are key aspects to consider when prescribing a DMD, irrespective of pregnancy status or plans. A full account of these is beyond the scope of this review and has been reviewed elsewhere [17][18][19].…”
Section: Methods and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cladribine tablets (oral administration) and alemtuzumab (given by infusion) are the two agents currently available that are believed to act as IRTs, and which are not administered continuously. Both are considered high-efficacy DMDs [ 19 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Disease-modifying Drugs and Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%