2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-022-02061-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clarify the nexus between life cycle assessment and circularity indicators: a SETAC/ACLCA interest group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature offers a variety of methods to do this evaluation, most of which evaluate the environmental aspect of CE. Saidani et al (2022) mentioned that CE evaluation methods could be categorized in different scopes and scales. This means that these methods can evaluate the performances under the effects of circular approaches in macro, micro, or the meso level, for different study boundaries.…”
Section: Methods For Evaluating Ce In Construction Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature offers a variety of methods to do this evaluation, most of which evaluate the environmental aspect of CE. Saidani et al (2022) mentioned that CE evaluation methods could be categorized in different scopes and scales. This means that these methods can evaluate the performances under the effects of circular approaches in macro, micro, or the meso level, for different study boundaries.…”
Section: Methods For Evaluating Ce In Construction Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, all keywords were used with only one combination of words, which likely limited the search results. Moreover, as contended by Saidani et al (2022), performing an LCA is frequently a complex and expert-level undertaking. Communicating the results also demands a certain level of expertise or support from environmental experts.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Europe has positioned itself as a leader in both the industrial and political spheres to drive global change. Moreover, according to Saidani et al (2022), elevating the degree of circularity within the economy enhances the chances of attaining the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) outlined by the United Nations (UN, 2015), especially in terms of responsible production and consumption (SDG 12). The need to promote such change arises from the evidence in the Global Resources Outlook 2019 (Oberle et al, 2019) that global annual resource extraction tripled from 1970 to 2017 and continues to rise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somit existieren nebeneinander ganz unterschiedliche Betrachtungen der potenziellen Umweltauswirkungen mit entsprechend abweichenden Ergebnissen. Eine weitere Vereinheitlichung und größere Transparenz sind neben der Integration von Stoffkreisläufen Gegenstand der aktuellen Methodenentwicklung in der Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung [33].…”
Section: Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung Der Elektrolyseunclassified