Clarifying responsibility: professional digital health in the doctor-patient relationship, recommendations for physicians based on a multi-stakeholder dialogue in the Netherlands

Abstract

Background Implementation of digital health (eHealth) generally involves adapting pre-established and carefully considered processes or routines, and still raises multiple ethical and legal dilemmas. This study aimed to identify challenges regarding responsibility and liability when prescribing digital health in clinical practice. This was part of an overarching project aiming to explore the most pressing ethical and legal obstacles regarding the implementation and adoption of digital health in the Netherlands, and to propose actionable solutions. Methods A series of multidisciplinary focus groups with stakeholders who have relevant digital health expertise were analysed through thematic analysis. Results The emerging general theme was ‘uncertainty regarding responsibilities’ when adopting digital health. Key dilemmas take place in clinical settings and within the doctor-patient relationship (‘professional digital health’). This context is particularly challenging because different stakeholders interact. In the absence of appropriate legal frameworks and codes of conduct tailored to digital health, physicians’ responsibility is to be found in their general duty of care. In other words: to do what is best for patients (not causing harm and doing good). Professional organisations could take a leading role to provide more clarity with respect to physicians’ responsibility, by developing guidance describing physicians’ duty of care in the context of digital health, and to address the resulting responsibilities. Conclusions Although legal frameworks governing medical practice describe core ethical principles, rights and obligations of physicians, they do not suffice to clarify their responsibilities in the setting of professional digital health. Here we present a series of recommendations to provide more clarity in this respect, offering the opportunity to improve quality of care and patients’ health. The recommendations can be used as a starting point to develop professional guidance and have the potential to be adapted to other healthcare professionals and systems.

Digital Literacy 5.0 to Enhance Multicultural Education

“…Their support is essential in helping patients understand and use digital tools effectively. This includes providing recommendations on reliable digital resources, assisting in navigati ng digital health records, and offering guidance on the interpretation of health information (126,127).…”

Digital health in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

“…The digital health revolution is a cultural transformation that brings disruptive technologies to both patients and healthcare providers, thereby altering the traditional doctor–patient relationship 115 . It not only supports ongoing efforts to achieve collaborative health management but also provides opportunities for selfmanagement, particularly for those suffering from chronic conditions, keeping patients informed about their health and promoting healthy behaviors 116 . It also allows patients to gain a deeper understanding of their condition, which is characterized by increased patient empowerment and a growing recognition of the biopsychosocial‐digital approach to health.…”

“… 115 It not only supports ongoing efforts to achieve collaborative health management but also provides opportunities for selfmanagement, particularly for those suffering from chronic conditions, keeping patients informed about their health and promoting healthy behaviors. 116 It also allows patients to gain a deeper understanding of their condition, which is characterized by increased patient empowerment and a growing recognition of the biopsychosocial‐digital approach to health. As a result, clinicians are shifting from gatekeepers of medical knowledge to guides for their patients navigating the complex landscape of health information.…”

Advances in Digital Health

“…All these advances must be balanced with the fundamentally important human interactions between patients and providers to augment rather than replace face-to-face care. 38…”

“…All these advances must be balanced with the fundamentally important human interactions between patients and providers to augment rather than replace face-to-face care. 38 Perhaps in 2024, Dr Caplan's new editorial will be entitled "What's wrong with the healthcare system that Mr Jones developed symptomatic cerebrovascular disease? "…”