1974
DOI: 10.1080/14662047408447207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class, clientelism, and coercion: Some mechanisms of internal dependency and control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

1976
1976
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While agrarian policy outputs that filter down through clientilist structures certainly benefit the large marginal peasantry, state patronage of the rural sector 'comes fairly close to representing the stock-in-trade of conservative regimes that hope both to avoid a redistribution of land or wealth and to forestall any possibility of a rural insurrection' [Scott, 1976: 215]. Clientilism in the underdeveloped countries thus defines the mechanisms of class control through which the peasantry is demobilised and inducted into the national political process [Flynn, 1974].…”
Section: Peasants Class Politics and The Patron-client Conceptmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While agrarian policy outputs that filter down through clientilist structures certainly benefit the large marginal peasantry, state patronage of the rural sector 'comes fairly close to representing the stock-in-trade of conservative regimes that hope both to avoid a redistribution of land or wealth and to forestall any possibility of a rural insurrection' [Scott, 1976: 215]. Clientilism in the underdeveloped countries thus defines the mechanisms of class control through which the peasantry is demobilised and inducted into the national political process [Flynn, 1974].…”
Section: Peasants Class Politics and The Patron-client Conceptmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been argued that the continuing vitality of patron-client relationships in peasant political behaviour in the underdeveloped regions is related to incomplete capitalist rationalisation [Leys, 1971;Flynn, 1974]. Local and parochial concerns suffuse political perceptions in such peasant communities, and clientilism becomes an adaptive device through which peasant demands for economic security are channelled into the political system.…”
Section: Peasants Class Politics and The Patron-client Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Il existe en outre une autre hiérarchie au sein des groupes, tous les clients n'étant pas égaux : les clients qui font preuve d'un appui plus généreux à l'endroit du patron et de ses projets politiques bénéfi-cient de plus grands avantages. Enfin, la concurrence individualisée pour des produits et services en quantité finie divise les classes inférieures, minant ainsi la solidarité de l'organisation (Flynn, 1975). Néanmoins, les données provenant de l'échelon local à Mexico démontrent que les ÉP peuvent parfois satisfaire aux trois critères de performance interreliés recherchés -performance institutionnelle, performance économique et performance psychologique -que les démocraties en émergence encore fragiles ne parviennent pas à atteindre, dans bien des cas.…”
Section: Attentes à L'égard De La Démocratie Et Limitations De Ce Sysunclassified
“…The emphasis has now moved to the examination of modes of production, class formation and interaction, the articulation of which is free from determination by spatial logic (Bozzoli, 1980;Foster-Carter, 1978;Mafeje, 1981;Raikes, 1978). However, the "primacy of class" as argued by Crush (1980, p. 347) has not precluded a discussion of the interconnections between spatial structure and political economy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At this community level, Kenyan politics still operates within a framework of patronage and clientelism (Mutiso, 1975;Okumu, 1968;Tomlinson, 1982, p. 25) but the objective of control, or 'internal dependency' as Flynn (1974) terms it, takes precedence over genuine representation (Bienen, 1974). Indeed, the proletariat and peasantry have been extrinsic to political conflict in Kenya, which tends to be characterised by division within the bourgeoisie, notably between national and local elements (Lamb, 1974;Leo, 1978;Leys, 1975Leys, , 1982Rana, 1977), often stimulated by the dictates of international capitalism (Godfrey and Langdon, 1976;Kaplinsky, 1982;Kirinyaga, 1974;Langdon, 1976;Leys, 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%