1973
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1973.11011454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class Size and Levels of Student Motivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason may be the difference in class size between lectures, labs, and seminars. Labs and seminars tend to have fewer students than large lectures, and having fewer students in the classroom is correlated with higher levels of student motivation (Bolander, 1973) and increased student course GPA (Kokkelenberg, Dillon, & Christy, 2008). Additionally, labs and seminars are often structured with less of a focus on passive content reception and more on active, participatory learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason may be the difference in class size between lectures, labs, and seminars. Labs and seminars tend to have fewer students than large lectures, and having fewer students in the classroom is correlated with higher levels of student motivation (Bolander, 1973) and increased student course GPA (Kokkelenberg, Dillon, & Christy, 2008). Additionally, labs and seminars are often structured with less of a focus on passive content reception and more on active, participatory learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bolander (1973) found that students exhibited higher motivation levels in smaller classes. Ozerk (2001) observed that students asked twice as many academic questions in smaller classes.…”
Section: Research Synergy and The Role Of Contextmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Bolander (1973) demonstrated through statistical analysis of data collected through questionnaires and interviews that students exhibited higher motivation levels in smaller classes (individual, intragroup lateral, and intragroup vertical motivation). Analyzing data collected through systematic observation, Ozerk (2001) found that class size had a strong influence on interaction patterns in classes.…”
Section: Mediating Effects Of Smaller Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%