Classification procedures for differential treatment

Abstract

Current classification procedure of structured interviews was compared to predicted classification derived from a psychological test. Results were sufficient to cast doubt on the validity of both the interview procedures and the derived predictions.

A combined rationally-empirically developed variable response scale for detecting the random response set in the Jesness inventory

“…The Jesness is commonly used in research concerning delinquent youth as well as in clinical work (Bornholt & Rosenthal, 1987;Bradley, Karwacki, & Peterson, 1990;Carpenter & Sandberg, 1985;Dembo et al, 1987;Estevao & Bichuette, 1985;Friesen & Wright, 1985;Gidycz & Koss, 1989;Jensen, Burke, & Garfinkel, 1988;Jesness, 1986Jesness, , 1988Lagier & Dickner, 1988;Lavery et al, 1993;Le Blanc et al, 1991;Munson & Gibson, 1986;Munson & Revers, 1986;Roberts et al, 1990;Wunderlich, 1985) and has been translated into several foreign languages (Jesness, 1983). It has been found to be susceptible to attempts by male delinquents to fake-good (Jesness, 1983).…”

Attitudinal Changes as Measured by the Jesness Behavior Checklist in a Residential Peer Group Program

“…No attempt was made for matching the personality of the young man with the peer group model leader. In the Bornholt and Rosenthal (1987) study, a crucial aspect of the treatment was to match the personalities of the subjects with the rehabilitator. The program, through multiple components, implements treatment with a number of goals including attitude change.…”