Cleaner Technology Application in Printing Factory (Offset Lithography System)

Aroonsrimorakot, Sayam; Yuwaree, Chumporn

doi:10.1016/j.apcbee.2013.05.036

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The early study also showed that the utilization of cleaner technologies in the printing industry reduces energy consumption by 149 841 kwh/year. 26 Energy saving and emission reductions have drawn wide attention internationally. Among cobenefits of energy saving and emission reduction analyses, most researchers focus on GHG emission reduction rather than wastewater emission reduction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Integrated Control of Emission Reductions, Energy-Saving, and Cost–Benefit Using a Multi-Objective Optimization Technique in the Pulp and Paper Industry

Wen

Zhang

2015

Environ. Sci. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reduction of water pollutant emissions and energy consumption is regarded as a key environmental objective for the pulp and paper industry. The paper develops a bottom-up model called the Industrial Water Pollutant Control and Technology Policy (IWPCTP) based on an industrial technology simulation system and multiconstraint technological optimization. Five policy scenarios covering the business as usual (BAU) scenario, the structural adjustment (SA) scenario, the cleaner technology promotion (CT) scenario, the end-treatment of pollutants (EOP) scenario, and the coupling measures (CM) scenario have been set to describe future policy measures related to the development of the pulp and paper industry from 2010-2020. The outcome of this study indicates that the energy saving amount under the CT scenario is the largest, while that under the SA scenario is the smallest. Under the CT scenario, savings by 2020 include 70 kt/year of chemical oxygen demand (COD) emission reductions and savings of 7443 kt of standard coal, 539.7 ton/year of ammonia nitrogen (NH4-N) emission reductions, and savings of 7444 kt of standard coal. Taking emission reductions, energy savings, and cost-benefit into consideration, cleaner technologies like highly efficient pulp washing, dry and wet feedstock preparation, and horizontal continuous cooking, medium and high consistency pulping and wood dry feedstock preparation are recommended.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Our study showed that the CT scenario can save the most energy since the high popularity of cleaner technologies and the industrial structure keep the same development model as the BAU scenario. The early study also showed that the utilization of cleaner technologies in the printing industry reduces energy consumption by 149 841 kwh/year …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated Control of Emission Reductions, Energy-Saving, and Cost–Benefit Using a Multi-Objective Optimization Technique in the Pulp and Paper Industry

Wen

Zhang

2015

Environ. Sci. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction Using Combined Cleaner Production Strategy and Carbon Emission Pinch Analysis in an Offset Printing Plant

Rahim,

Raja Ehsan Shah,

Sulaiman

et al. 2023

CNREJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, Cleaner Production (CP) strategy and Carbon Emission Pinch Analysis (CEPA) were used to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emission generated in printing industry. CP audit was conducted in a printing premise to quantify the consumption of materials and energy, waste generated and other aspect such as safety and productivity. The amount of CO2 emission generated from the operations and activities in the premise was estimated to identify key issues. Subsequently, CP options were identified to overcome the issues. Feasibility studies were conducted for each option identified to evaluate the reduction of CO2 emission and monetary returns. The study revealed that a total of 0.8 kg CO2 emission was generated per kg of paper processed, where electricity consumption was the main contributor. A total of eight CP options were identified and evaluated to reduce CO2 emission generated from the electricity consumption and solid waste generation. Implementations of the suggested CP options are expected to potentially reduce the CO2 emission to 0.7 tons CO2/kg of processed paper, which is a reduction of 78%. The CEPA study also demonstrated that a saving of 211,194 kWh/month of electricity and a reduction of CO2 emission of 141.5 tons/month (68%) from the total emission of 209 tons/month could be achieved. There are four CP options can be implemented without any cost incurred, with expected CO2 emission reduction of 96.5 tons/month. Hence, the case study proves that it is possible to reduce CO2 emission in printing premise by implementing CP and CEPA.

show abstract

Cleaner Technology Application in Printing Factory (Offset Lithography System)

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Integrated Control of Emission Reductions, Energy-Saving, and Cost–Benefit Using a Multi-Objective Optimization Technique in the Pulp and Paper Industry

Integrated Control of Emission Reductions, Energy-Saving, and Cost–Benefit Using a Multi-Objective Optimization Technique in the Pulp and Paper Industry

Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction Using Combined Cleaner Production Strategy and Carbon Emission Pinch Analysis in an Offset Printing Plant

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About