2020
DOI: 10.1037/emo0000545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clear judgments based on unclear evidence: Person evaluation is strongly influenced by untrustworthy gossip.

Abstract: Affective information about other people's social behavior may prejudice social interactions and bias person judgments. The trustworthiness of person-related information, however, can vary considerably, as in the case of gossip, rumours, lies, or so-called "fake news". Here, we investigated how spontaneous person-likability and explicit person judgments are influenced by trustworthiness, employing event-related potentials as indexes of emotional brain responses. Social-emotional information about the (im)moral… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(84 reference statements)
5
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholz et al, 2017, Vosoughi et al, 2018. Recent studies investigating the impact of information of questionable veracity have provided first evidence that the emotional content strongly affects social judgements and neural correlates while the impact of trustworthiness is limited (Baum & Abdel Rahman, 2020;Baum, Rabovsky, Rose, & Abdel Rahman, 2018). Here, we investigate pupil dilation responses as indexes of the cognitive or emotional processes underpinning these judgments.…”
Section: Statement Of Relevancementioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Scholz et al, 2017, Vosoughi et al, 2018. Recent studies investigating the impact of information of questionable veracity have provided first evidence that the emotional content strongly affects social judgements and neural correlates while the impact of trustworthiness is limited (Baum & Abdel Rahman, 2020;Baum, Rabovsky, Rose, & Abdel Rahman, 2018). Here, we investigate pupil dilation responses as indexes of the cognitive or emotional processes underpinning these judgments.…”
Section: Statement Of Relevancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Effects of instructed reappraisal of emotional faces was an approximately 0.05 mm change (Yih et al, 2018). Additionally, ERP results (Baum et al, 2018;Baum & Abdel Rahman, 2019) have shown numerically slightly weaker emotion effects of positive than of negative information compared to neutral.…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crucially, the LPP is sensitive to additional information such as context and relevance, putting emotional contents into perspective (Blechert et al, 2012;Herbert et al, 2011;Rellecke et al, 2012;Schacht & Sommer, 2009b;Schindler et al, 2019), whereas the EPN is relatively independent of task demands and the relevance of emotional contents in a given context (Herbert et al, 2011;Herbert et al, 2013;Schacht & Sommer, 2009b). It is noteworthy that this evidence of additional contextual influences on ERPs comes from studies testing effects of emotional information immediately, while there is scarce evidence of such contextual effects on later consequences (Baum et al, 2018). We expected that the EPN is mainly sensitive to the emotional content of the headlines irrespective of source credibility, whereas emotion effects in LPP amplitudes should be modulated by source credibility, with reduced amplitudes for distrusted sources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modulation may be primarily found for positive headlines if negative information is prioritized as protection against potential threat (cf. Baum et al, 2018). The present study was preregistered under the OSF (Baum & Abdel Rahman, 2018 2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%