1967
DOI: 10.1002/9780470771075.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleavage of the COC bond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the nanocluster formation and concomitant hydrogenation reaction at 22 ± 0.1 °C, NMR and GC/MS analyses show that the neat acetone undergoes 95% conversion in 2 h and has reached 100% conversion in 9 h with a selectivity of 0.95 equiv (95%) 2-propanol and 0.025 equiv (=5% of the converted acetone) of diisopropyl ether (plus 0.025 equiv of water by mass balance), eq 2. The diisopropyl ether is the expected side product from the H + -catalyzed condensation of two isopropyl alcohol product molecules . Further details regarding the composite reaction stoichiometry due to the consecutive reactions of isopropyl alcohol and then diisopropyl ether formation, plus use of that balanced reaction to calculate properly the product yields, are provided in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the nanocluster formation and concomitant hydrogenation reaction at 22 ± 0.1 °C, NMR and GC/MS analyses show that the neat acetone undergoes 95% conversion in 2 h and has reached 100% conversion in 9 h with a selectivity of 0.95 equiv (95%) 2-propanol and 0.025 equiv (=5% of the converted acetone) of diisopropyl ether (plus 0.025 equiv of water by mass balance), eq 2. The diisopropyl ether is the expected side product from the H + -catalyzed condensation of two isopropyl alcohol product molecules . Further details regarding the composite reaction stoichiometry due to the consecutive reactions of isopropyl alcohol and then diisopropyl ether formation, plus use of that balanced reaction to calculate properly the product yields, are provided in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a survey of literature concerning the phenolic protective groups, the currently used methods were alkylation, benzylation and acylation (Haslam 1973, Reese 1973, Staude and Patat 1958 and the deprotective agents were protonic and Lewis acids (Haslam 1973, Reese 1973, Staude and Patat 1958, McOmie et al 1968, Teitel and O'Brien 1976, Vickery etal. 1979, Minamikawa and Brossi 1978, Brossi et al 1967, Jempty et al 1981, Prager and Tan 1967, nucleophilic and electrophilic reagents (Loubinoux et al 1980, Feutrill and Mirrington 1970, Hansson and Wickberg 1976, Caroll et al 1980, or combinations of the last two (Node et al 1980, Williard andFryhie 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%