2003
DOI: 10.1373/49.4.575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleaved Protein S (PS), Total PS, Free PS, and Activated Protein C Cofactor Activity as Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism

Abstract: Background: Although hereditary protein S (PS) deficiency is clearly associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE), the importance of low PS concentrations as a risk factor for VTE in other patients is still a matter of debate. To clarify this issue, we designed a case-control study to evaluate the role of different molecular forms of plasma PS. Methods: We quantified plasma cleaved, total, and free PS and activated protein C (APC) cofactor activity in 87 VTE patients and 174 controls matched for age, sex, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average portion of cleaved protein S that we observed (ǠFig. 1) in our Dutch population of 106 healthy control subjects (25 ± 8%), is more than twice as high as the 10% reported by Borgel et al (26). The cause of this apparent discrepancy is unclear, but it might be a methodological issue.…”
Section: Subjectscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The average portion of cleaved protein S that we observed (ǠFig. 1) in our Dutch population of 106 healthy control subjects (25 ± 8%), is more than twice as high as the 10% reported by Borgel et al (26). The cause of this apparent discrepancy is unclear, but it might be a methodological issue.…”
Section: Subjectscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…This type of PS deficiency is often, but not always, 16 associated with the PROS1 Ser 460 →Pro (Heerlen) mutation. 17 Although PS deficiency and, particularly, low levels of free PS 18,19 are an established risk factor for venous thrombosis, risk estimates differ widely among studies, possibly reflecting the different severity of the underlying molecular defects. 20 Moreover, the few epidemiological studies that distinguish between type I and type III deficiencies are rather contradictory with respect to the risk of thrombosis associated with type III deficiency, which was found to be none, 21 the same as in type I deficiency 22 or intermediate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of thrombosis associated with PS deficiency is a controversial issue. [31][32][33][34] In this respect, it should be remembered that because the GAIT Project attempted to identify genetic factors underlying idiopathic thrombophilia, PS deficient families were excluded from the sample. 6 16 This explains the lack of correlations among the PS plasma phenotypes and the thrombotic liability in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%