Click it or give it: Increased seat belt law enforcement and organ donation

Abstract

Laws mandating that individuals wear a seat belt have the presumed goal of reducing motor vehicle accident fatalities, but the prevailing view is that they may reduce the number of organs available. I provide a conceptual model identifying mechanisms whereby the law could either increase or decrease organ donation. Exploiting variation across states and time in the adoption of primary seat belt enforcement, I investigate these mechanisms and estimate the effect of the law on the supply of organs. The law increases seat belt usage and decreases motor vehicle accident fatalities, which translates to a sizeable reduction in the number of motor vehicle accident-based organ donors. In contrast, the law is not associated with changes in the number of organ donors from nonmotor vehicle accident-based sources and is robust to controlling for hospital-specific effects. The effects are concentrated within organs expected to be most negatively impacted by the seat belt. Although primary enforcement represents a net-gain to society in terms of lives saved, the negative impact on organ donation suggests further emphasis be placed on policies aimed at increasing the availability of organs.

Driver's licences for undocumented immigrants and post‐mortem organ donation

“…Several additional state‐level variables are included to account for omitted variable bias and drawing from previous studies' model specifications (Callison and Levin 2016; Brewer 2020). Higher unemployment rate and share of population in poverty could have some serious economic repercussions as affected local residents struggle to meet basic living needs and prioritize survival efforts by focusing more on job sourcing and income enhancement opportunities.…”

A Technological and Regulatory Review on Human–Animal Chimera Research: The Current Landscape of Biology, Law, and Public Opinion

“…Organs from deceased donors make up over half of all organs transplanted 4 , 6 , and over half of those donors were over the age of 50 years, implying their organs are aged as well 7 . As the U.S. population increases and lives longer, organ demand will likely increase, while the organ supply will likely decrease as advances in vehicle safety and improved medical interventions result in fewer deceased donors 8 .…”