“…Yield of HIV positive individuals (HIV positivity) was reported in 29 home studies 14,15,18,27,29–32,34,36,38,41–45,63,65,66,68,70–73,88,89 , one home with self-testing 11 , 12 mobile 10,13,68,72,92–95,97,98,103,107,114 , five campaign 46,47,76,77,120 , three workplace 79,80,121 , four key population 12,115,116,122 , four index partner 48–50,88 , 27 facility VCT 54–56,64,81,84,88,91–93,95,98,102,104–107,114,118–120,123–127 , and 17 facility PITC 56,57,59,60,81,83–88,99,110–113,126 studies. Community-based strategies for the general population had lower HIV positivity (6–11%) than facility HTC (18–20%), whereas targeted community HTC for key populations and sexual partners of index patients had the highest HIV yield (Fig.…”