2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and demographic data improve diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI in differential diagnostics of parotid gland tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest sensitivity and specificity were 84.2% and 91.9%. They combined T peak , WR, ADC value in diagnosis Warthin’s tumor from malignant tumor, which the sensitivity and specificity were lower than our study [ 28 ]. TTP is known to correlate inversely with microvessel density in the examined tissue, and WOR was shown to increase proportionally to the amount of connective tissue within the lesion [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highest sensitivity and specificity were 84.2% and 91.9%. They combined T peak , WR, ADC value in diagnosis Warthin’s tumor from malignant tumor, which the sensitivity and specificity were lower than our study [ 28 ]. TTP is known to correlate inversely with microvessel density in the examined tissue, and WOR was shown to increase proportionally to the amount of connective tissue within the lesion [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The malignant parotid tumor group showed a significantly lower value on 10th TTP and a higher value on skewness MRE than the benign tumor group except for the Warthin’s tumor group. Compared with previous studies [ 9 , 28 ], most of them compared pleomorphic adenoma with malignant tumor, whether ADC histogram or dynamic enhanced MRI parameters were used. However, ADC mean , T peak which commonly used in clinic does not show good sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 14 Their team further differentiated MTs from PAs and WTs, with sensitivity of 88.9–94.4%, specificity of 88.9%–96.4%, and AUC of 0.949–0.969. 18 However, in some other studies, DWI and DCE-PWI were difficult to distinguish MTs from WTs. 2 , 7 , 17 , 20 It can be seen that these parameters have incomplete reproducibility and reliability, and a large sample size in more centers are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although DCE-PWI and DWI can respectively differentiating parotid tumors by semiquantitative and quantitative analyses of time-intensity curve pattern and apparent diffusion coefficient values, there are relatively large inter-study differences in results, or standardization is still lacking. 7,14,[17][18][19] Besides, the interobserver variation and limited availability of the examinations seem to be potential obstacles to their widespread use. 13,14 T2-weighted imaging, as a conventional sequence, can be used in all field strength equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) gains recognition in the diagnostic algorithm of salivary gland tumors, providing data from different diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) models and dynamic contrast enhanced sequences (DCE-MRI) [5][6][7][8][9]. Diffusion-weighted imaging reflects the cell density of the tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%