2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and pathologic features of young endometrial cancer patients with loss of mismatch repair expression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
18
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of an isolated loss of MSH6 protein expression in our study was 16.4% (11 of 67 patients). The reported incidence of the loss of MSH6 protein expression in young patients with endometrial carcinomas varies greatly in the literature, ranging from 7% for patients diagnosed at less than 60 yr of age to 26% for patients less than 50 yr of age (2,10). MSH6 loss was also the commonest MMR defect in the latter study (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The incidence of an isolated loss of MSH6 protein expression in our study was 16.4% (11 of 67 patients). The reported incidence of the loss of MSH6 protein expression in young patients with endometrial carcinomas varies greatly in the literature, ranging from 7% for patients diagnosed at less than 60 yr of age to 26% for patients less than 50 yr of age (2,10). MSH6 loss was also the commonest MMR defect in the latter study (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Studies have shown that loss of MMR protein expression in endometrial carcinoma is associated with poor prognostic factors, including higher incidence of high-grade histology, FIGO Stage III/IV, deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular permeation, and lymph node metastasis (2,15,21). These findings were discussed in a recent review article by Garg and Soslow (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,12,14,29 Lu et al 14 found that a BMI greater than 30 kg/m 2 and a negative family history were highly predictive of not having an LS mutation. The mean BMI for the mutational carriers was 29.2 kg/m 2 compared with 37.5 kg/m 2 for women without a germline mutation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean BMI for the mutational carriers was 29.2 kg/m 2 compared with 37.5 kg/m 2 for women without a germline mutation. The study by Grzankowski et al, 29 utilizing tumor testing for MMR deficiency, found that a BMI greater than 40 kg/m 2 was observed in zero of the patients with MMR deficient tumors compared with 35% of patient with intact MMR. Based on these studies, one would expect to find a low incidence of LSassociated EC in our very obese Hispanic cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%