2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01363-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of ependymomas in the upper cervical spinal cord: a single-center experience of 155 consecutive patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with several publications [12,13]. In accordance with our findings and previously conducted studies [10] observing a solid correlation of postoperative neurological decrease with the extent of preoperative disability, we recommend early surgery when patients' neurological deficits are mild. As observed in our study, only a small proportion of patients improved their functional status compared with the status before surgery (5.7% in our series).…”
Section: Prognostic Factors For Neurologic Deteriorationsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with several publications [12,13]. In accordance with our findings and previously conducted studies [10] observing a solid correlation of postoperative neurological decrease with the extent of preoperative disability, we recommend early surgery when patients' neurological deficits are mild. As observed in our study, only a small proportion of patients improved their functional status compared with the status before surgery (5.7% in our series).…”
Section: Prognostic Factors For Neurologic Deteriorationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There is current evidence that the cervical location is an adverse predictive factor for functional outcomes after the surgery of IMSCT. In a large retrospective study reporting on ependymomas of the upper cervical spinal cord, Fei et al reported on postoperative neurological impairment in 76% of patients and observed a subsequent slow recovery during the next 56 months, still rendering 21% of patients with permanent deterioration [10]. A similar trend of the preoperative, early, and late postoperative neurological status of their patients was reported by another series of intramedullary ependymomas, with a significant deterioration in McCormick scale in the early postoperative period and a recovery to the preoperative condition at the follow-up [11].…”
Section: Clinical Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A German team led by Behmanesh proposed that regional spinal cord atrophy was associated with poor long-term outcome after surgical removal of intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma [4]. Fei et al postulated the tumor-to-cord ratio might be a predictor for the surgical outcome of upper cervical ependymomas, while the logistic regression analysis yielded a negative result [8]. Arima and coworkers found that quantitative analysis of near-infrared indocyanine green angiography could predict functional outcomes after spinal ependymoma removal [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the small sample size in the incomplete resection cohort, we failed to analyze the correlation between the extent of surgical resection and functional outcomes. Some scholars found permanent de cits after the spinal ependymoma resection was independently predicted by older age [3,8,27]. Bansal et al followed up 146 patients with spinal intramedullary tumors; they found that the surgical outcome at the last follow-up was correlated with age, sex, the preoperative functional status, tumor size, location, pathology, the extent of surgical resection, and the presence of syringomyelia [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early symptoms are variable and may only subtly progress; their appearance before diagnosis is often in the three- to four-year range, although intratumoral hemorrhage may trigger an abrupt decline [ 25 , 26 ]. Symptoms and deficits are related to the specific location and extent of the tumor.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%