2015
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfv232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical decision support system for end-stage kidney disease risk estimation in IgA nephropathy patients

Abstract: This CDSS provides useful additional information for identifying 'high-risk' IgAN patients and may help stratify them in the context of a personalized medicine approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the classification used in the ANN model [13], histological grading was defined as: G1 (mild) in subjects with minimal or minor lesions, G2 (moderate) in patients with diffuse proliferative or focal segmental glomerulonephritis and G3 (severe) in those with sclerotic and advanced chronic renal lesions. The details of other pathological data were also reviewed according to the Oxford classification criteria for IgAN [16].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Clinicopathological Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to the classification used in the ANN model [13], histological grading was defined as: G1 (mild) in subjects with minimal or minor lesions, G2 (moderate) in patients with diffuse proliferative or focal segmental glomerulonephritis and G3 (severe) in those with sclerotic and advanced chronic renal lesions. The details of other pathological data were also reviewed according to the Oxford classification criteria for IgAN [16].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Clinicopathological Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, histological lesions were scored with three grades according to the classification used in the ANN model [13] as part of the CDSS for IgAN (www.IgAN.net): G1 (mild) , G2 (moderate) and G3 (severe). Finally, immunostainings for various immunoglobulins and complement components were analysed.…”
Section: Clinical and Pathological Characteristics Of The Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prevalence of IgAN shows marked differences across different ethnic groups, being more prevalent in people with East Asian ancestry and less prevalent in people with African ancestry compared with Caucasians 2 . In addition, differences in the clinical features of IgAN in Caucasian compared with Chinese patients have been recognized for a long time 3 , most notably the clear male preponderance of IgAN in Caucasian studies of IgAN that is absent (or even reversed) in East Asian populations, suggesting that important and incompletely understood differences in disease pathophysiology exist across different populations [4][5][6][7][8] . Recent work has identified a number of genetic factors, mostly associated with mechanisms of defense against infection, that are associated with altered risk of disease [9][10][11] , and although the prevalence of the known genetic factors vary across different ethnic groups, the observed differences fall some way short of explaining the differences in prevalence of the disease in different regions 2,12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%