2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep23376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of a Fully-automatic Segmentation Method for Longitudinal Brain Tumor Volumetry

Abstract: Information about the size of a tumor and its temporal evolution is needed for diagnosis as well as treatment of brain tumor patients. The aim of the study was to investigate the potential of a fully-automatic segmentation method, called BraTumIA, for longitudinal brain tumor volumetry by comparing the automatically estimated volumes with ground truth data acquired via manual segmentation. Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging data of 14 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma encompassing 64 MR acqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
95
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very few completely automatic segmentation algorithms have been adopted in the clinic. Recently, only one automated tool has been clinically evaluated [33]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few completely automatic segmentation algorithms have been adopted in the clinic. Recently, only one automated tool has been clinically evaluated [33]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segmentation of brain volumes into gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tissue types relying on MRI data has a wide clinical relevance, including volumetric analysis in neurodegenerative disorders, as well as reliable quantification of lesion morphometry and classification in longitudinal examinations …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OsiriX4647 and 3D slicer4849 methods have been used to estimate the tumor volume. Other software also demonstrated high reliability5051525354.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%