2019
DOI: 10.1111/pace.13728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of a small implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector

Abstract: IntroductionWe conducted this study to show the safety and efficacy of a new implantable cardiac monitor (ICM), the BioMonitor 2 (Biotronik SE & Co. KG; Berlin, Germany), and to describe the arrhythmia detection performance.MethodsThe BioMonitor 2 has an extended sensing vector and is implanted close to the heart. It can transmit up to six subcutaneous electrocardiogram strips by Home Monitoring each day. We enrolled 92 patients with a standard device indication for an ICM in a single‐arm, multicenter prospect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, patients with higher P‐wave voltage at surface ECG (≥0.2 mV) have higher chances to have a well‐visible P wave at ICM signal. The above findings confirmed on a large and multicenter population the excellent sensing performance of the long vector ICM already found in previous smaller and single‐center experiences 8‐12 . In addition, as a novelty, we explored subgroups of patients where there are concerns about ICM signal quality, such as females and obese subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As expected, patients with higher P‐wave voltage at surface ECG (≥0.2 mV) have higher chances to have a well‐visible P wave at ICM signal. The above findings confirmed on a large and multicenter population the excellent sensing performance of the long vector ICM already found in previous smaller and single‐center experiences 8‐12 . In addition, as a novelty, we explored subgroups of patients where there are concerns about ICM signal quality, such as females and obese subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The sensitivity for shorter regular episodes of atrial fibrillation is lower, but it is unlikely that the device will miss longer lasting (e.g., hours to days) episodes of atrial fibrillation. Hence, the sensitivity to identify patients with arrhythmias is very good [28]. Due to their subcutaneous positioning, they cause a very low risk, and they do not limit the patient’s activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BioMonitor 2 (Biotronik SE & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany) or successor devices will be used [28]. It is a subcutaneous ICM that continuously monitors the heart rhythm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of AF detection was calculated based on sensitivity and specificity estimates for the monitoring methods. BIOMONITOR estimates were derived from the BioMonitor 2 Master Study 16 and we assumed that all ICMs were successfully planted. SoC was taken to consist of the same mix of monitoring methods as reported for CRYSTAL-AF.…”
Section: Af Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative for patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke and suspected AF is the use of an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM), such as BIOMONITOR 16,17 . All ICMs are inserted under the skin in the left pectoral area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%