2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12928-022-00875-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical expert consensus document on standards for lower extremity artery disease of imaging modality from the Japan Endovascular Treatment Conference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After DCB treatment, the image slices were analyzed to evaluate the MLA. All parameters were analyzed by participating specialists at each hospital certified by the academic society in Japan according to the current clinical expert consensus document of the EVT imaging 16) .…”
Section: Ivus Analysis and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After DCB treatment, the image slices were analyzed to evaluate the MLA. All parameters were analyzed by participating specialists at each hospital certified by the academic society in Japan according to the current clinical expert consensus document of the EVT imaging 16) .…”
Section: Ivus Analysis and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, angiographic and IVUS findings, baseline characteristics, and clinical events were not evaluated by an external core laboratory. However, to reduce the bias of measuring the parameters, the observers assessed the findings according to the current consensus document 16) . Fourth, the current guideline recommends bypass surgery for patients with FP lesion longer than 25 cm 4) ; however, 16.0% of patients with long FP lesions underwent EVT in this study because of poor general condition and comorbidities.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angioscopic images were analyzed for each stent to determine: (1) the dominant degree of neointimal coverage over the stent; (2) the heterogeneity of neointimal coverage; (3) the yellow color grade of the stented segment; and (4) thrombus adhesion in the stented segment. Neointimal coverage over the stent was classified into 4 grades, as described previously: 10 Grade 0, stent struts fully visible, similar to the status observed immediately after implantation; Grade 1, stent struts bulging into the lumen, although covered, still visible; Grade 2, stent struts embedded in the neointima, but visible; and Grade 3, stent struts fully embedded and invisible on angioscopy.…”
Section: Angioscopic Analysis and Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneity of neointimal coverage has been previously defined. 10 Briefly, neointimal coverage was evaluated throughout the entire stented segments, and was judged as heterogeneous when differences in the neointimal coverage grade became apparent. Struts located in the overlapped segment were excluded from grading, as were stent edges.…”
Section: Angioscopic Analysis and Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment strategies were classified into plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), bare nitinol stent (BNS), DCB, DES, CS, and spot bare nitinol stent implantation with POBA (spot). Technical success was defined as < 30% residual stenosis without flow-limiting severe dissection after stent implantation or after the balloon angioplasty strategy (Fujihara et al 2022). Follow-up clinical evaluations were conducted six and 12 months after the procedure.…”
Section: Endovascular Therapy Procedures and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%